These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

297 related items for PubMed ID: 15558088

  • 21. Effect of photoactivation systems and resin composites on the microleakage of esthetic restorations.
    Cavalcante LM, Peris AR, Ambrosano GM, Ritter AV, Pimenta LA.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Feb 01; 8(2):70-9. PubMed ID: 17277829
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Influence of location of the gingival margin on the microleakage and internal voids of nanocomposites.
    Ozel E, Korkmaz Y, Attar N.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Nov 01; 9(7):65-72. PubMed ID: 18997918
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. The effect of different drying methods for single step adhesive systems on microleakage of tooth colored restorations.
    Owens BM.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2003 Feb 15; 4(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 12595929
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Effect of different modes of light curing and resin composites on microleakage of Class II restorations.
    Hardan LS, Amm EW, Ghayad A.
    Odontostomatol Trop; 2008 Dec 15; 31(124):27-34. PubMed ID: 19441264
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. The marginal seal of Class II restorations: flowable composite resin compared to injectable glass ionomer.
    Payne JH.
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999 Dec 15; 23(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 10204453
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Effect of light source position and bevel placement on facial margin adaptation of resin-based composite restorations.
    Hoelscher DC, Gregory WA, Linger JB, Pink FE.
    Am J Dent; 2000 Aug 15; 13(4):171-5. PubMed ID: 11763925
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Influence of different softstart polymerization techniques on marginal adaptation of Class V restorations.
    Muangmingsuk A, Senawongse P, Yudhasaraprasithi S.
    Am J Dent; 2003 Apr 15; 16(2):117-9. PubMed ID: 12797570
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Influence of new light curing units and bonding agents on the microleakage of Class V composite resin restorations.
    Pradelle-Plasse N, Besnault C, Souad N, Colon P.
    Am J Dent; 2003 Dec 15; 16(6):409-13. PubMed ID: 15002957
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite.
    de Andrade OS, de Goes MF, Montes MA.
    Dent Mater; 2007 Mar 15; 23(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 16546249
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Cavity preparation factors and microleakage of Class II composite restorations filled at intraoral temperatures.
    Hilton TJ, Ferracane JL.
    Am J Dent; 1999 Jun 15; 12(3):123-30. PubMed ID: 10649934
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. A microleakage study of single-bottle adhesives applied to enamel and cementum and aged by both occlusal loading and thermocycling.
    Ben-Amar A, Pilo R, Shapinko E, Lewinstein I.
    Quintessence Int; 2005 Mar 15; 36(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 15887502
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Microleakage of seven adhesive systems in enamel and dentin.
    Silveira de Araújo C, Incerti da Silva T, Ogliari FA, Meireles SS, Piva E, Demarco FF.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Nov 01; 7(5):26-33. PubMed ID: 17091137
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Effect of dentin adhesives on the enamel-dentin/composite interfacial microleakage.
    Pradelle-Plasse N, Nechad S, Tavernier B, Colon P.
    Am J Dent; 2001 Dec 01; 14(6):344-8. PubMed ID: 11949792
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Effect of plasma arc curing on the microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations.
    Brackett WW, Haisch LD, Covey DA.
    Am J Dent; 2000 Jun 01; 13(3):121-2. PubMed ID: 11763946
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Microleakage of multi-step and simplified-step bonding systems.
    Castelnuovo J, Tjan AH, Liu P.
    Am J Dent; 1996 Dec 01; 9(6):245-8. PubMed ID: 9545877
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Class II composite resin restorations with two polymerization techniques: relationship between microtensile bond strength and marginal leakage.
    Cenci M, Demarco F, de Carvalho R.
    J Dent; 2005 Aug 01; 33(7):603-10. PubMed ID: 16005800
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. The effect of flowable resin composites as gingival increments on the microleakage of posterior resin composites.
    Attar N, Turgut MD, Güngör HC.
    Oper Dent; 2004 Aug 01; 29(2):162-7. PubMed ID: 15088727
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Effect of low-viscosity resins on the performance of dental adhesives.
    Swift EJ, Triolo PT, Barkmeier WW, Bird JL, Bounds SJ.
    Am J Dent; 1996 Jun 01; 9(3):100-4. PubMed ID: 9002798
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Leakage pathway of Class V cavities restored with different flowable resin composite restorations.
    Awliya WY, El-Sahn AM.
    Oper Dent; 2008 Jun 01; 33(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 18335730
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. The leakage of Class II cavities restored with packable resin-based composites.
    Bala O, Uçtasli MB, Unlü I.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2003 Nov 15; 4(4):1-11. PubMed ID: 14625591
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.