These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. The Toronto root stentless valve in the subcoronary position is hemodynamically superior to the mosaic stented completely supra-annular bioprosthesis. Bleiziffer S, Eichinger WB, Wagner I, Guenzinger R, Bauernschmitt R, Lange R. J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Nov; 14(6):814-21; discussion 821. PubMed ID: 16359064 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Stentless bioprostheses improve postoperative coronary flow more than stented prostheses after valve replacement for aortic stenosis. Bakhtiary F, Schiemann M, Dzemali O, Wittlinger T, Doss M, Ackermann H, Moritz A, Kleine P. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 Apr; 131(4):883-8. PubMed ID: 16580448 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Does the type of prosthesis influence early left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement? Assessment with magnetic resonance imaging. Sensky PR, Loubani M, Keal RP, Samani NJ, Sosnowski AW, Galiñanes M. Am Heart J; 2003 Oct; 146(4):E13. PubMed ID: 14564336 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Stentless aortic valves are hemodynamically superior to stented valves during mid-term follow-up: a large retrospective study. Borger MA, Carson SM, Ivanov J, Rao V, Scully HE, Feindel CM, David TE. Ann Thorac Surg; 2005 Dec; 80(6):2180-5. PubMed ID: 16305867 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-term results with the Biocor-SJM stentless porcine aortic bioprosthesis. Vrandecic M, Fantini FA, Filho BG, de O, da C, Vrandecic E. J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Jan; 11(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 11843505 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of valve replacement on left ventricular function in patients with aortic regurgitation and severe ventricular disease. Collinson J, Flather M, Pepper JR, Henein M. J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 Sep; 13(5):722-8. PubMed ID: 15473469 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of high transvalvular to subvalvular velocity ratio early after aortic valve replacement with Freestyle stentless aortic bioprosthesis. Bach DS, Cartier PA, Kon N, Johnson KG, Dumesnil JG, Doty DB, Freestyle Valve Study Group. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Oct; 13(4 Suppl 1):75-81. PubMed ID: 11805953 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of small valve size on hemodynamics and left ventricular mass regression with the Toronto SPV stentless aortic bioprosthesis. Bach DS, Goldman B, Verrier E, Petracek M, Wood J, Goldman S, David T, Toronto SPV Valve Study Group. J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Mar; 11(2):236-41. PubMed ID: 12000166 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Early experience with Shelhigh stentless composite valve. A complete biological replacement of ascending aorta. Szafranek A, Akar R, Jasiński M, Woś S, Sosnowski A. Kardiol Pol; 2003 Jan; 58(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 14502300 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Indexed effective orifice area after mechanical aortic valve replacement does not affect left ventricular mass regression in elderly. Roscitano A, Benedetto U, Sciangula A, Merico E, Barberi F, Bianchini R, Tonelli E, Sinatra R. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2006 Feb; 29(2):139-43. PubMed ID: 16376565 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]