These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

343 related items for PubMed ID: 15561568

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Gadolinium-based contrast media compared with iodinated media for digital subtraction angiography in azotaemic patients.
    Erley CM, Bader BD, Berger ED, Tuncel N, Winkler S, Tepe G, Risler T, Duda S.
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2004 Oct; 19(10):2526-31. PubMed ID: 15280530
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Renal effects of bicarbonate versus saline infusion for iso- and lowosmolar contrast media in rats.
    Ladwig M, Flemming B, Seeliger E, Sargsyan L, Persson PB.
    Invest Radiol; 2011 Nov; 46(11):672-7. PubMed ID: 21623210
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography: first-pass arterial enhancement as a function of gadolinium-chelate concentration, and the saline chaser volume and injection rate.
    Husarik DB, Bashir MR, Weber PW, Nichols EB, Howle LE, Merkle EM, Nelson RC.
    Invest Radiol; 2012 Feb; 47(2):121-7. PubMed ID: 21934516
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Are gadolinium-based contrast media really safer than iodinated media for digital subtraction angiography in patients with azotemia?
    Nyman U, Elmståhl B, Leander P, Nilsson M, Golman K, Almén T.
    Radiology; 2002 May; 223(2):311-8; discussion 328-9. PubMed ID: 11997530
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The impact of the viscosity and osmolality of iodine contrast agents on renal elimination.
    Jost G, Pietsch H, Lengsfeld P, Hütter J, Sieber MA.
    Invest Radiol; 2010 May; 45(5):255-61. PubMed ID: 20375847
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Incidence of ventricular fibrillation during left coronary arteriography in pigs: comparison of a solution of the nonionic dimer iodixanol with solutions of five different nonionic monomers.
    Chai CM, Karlsson JO, Almén T.
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Mar; 49(2):150-6. PubMed ID: 18300138
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Retention of iodine and expression of biomarkers for renal damage in the kidney after application of iodinated contrast media in rats.
    Jost G, Pietsch H, Sommer J, Sandner P, Lengsfeld P, Seidensticker P, Lehr S, Hütter J, Sieber MA.
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Feb; 44(2):114-23. PubMed ID: 19104440
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The use of iohexol clearance to determine GFR in patients with severe chronic renal failure--a comparison between different clearance techniques.
    Frennby B, Sterner G, Almén T, Hagstam KE, Hultberg B, Jacobsson L.
    Clin Nephrol; 1995 Jan; 43(1):35-46. PubMed ID: 7697934
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Nephrotoxic effects in high-risk patients undergoing angiography.
    Aspelin P, Aubry P, Fransson SG, Strasser R, Willenbrock R, Berg KJ, Nephrotoxicity in High-Risk Patients Study of Iso-Osmolar and Low-Osmolar Non-Ionic Contrast Media Study Investigators.
    N Engl J Med; 2003 Feb 06; 348(6):491-9. PubMed ID: 12571256
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 18.