These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

203 related items for PubMed ID: 1556536

  • 1. Comparison of electrocardiogram interpretations by family physicians, a computer, and a cardiology service.
    Woolley D, Henck M, Luck J.
    J Fam Pract; 1992 Apr; 34(4):428-32. PubMed ID: 1556536
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Computerized electrocardiogram interpretations: are they useful for the family physician?
    Grauer K, Kravitz L, Curry RW, Ariet M.
    J Fam Pract; 1987 Jan; 24(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 3540179
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Employment of intra-individual variability to improve computerized ECG interpretation.
    Schijvenaars BJ, Kors JA, van Herpen G, van Bemmel JH.
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2001 Jan; 84(Pt 1):513-7. PubMed ID: 11604793
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [Computer-based interpretation of ECG--guiding or misleading?].
    Morisbak B, Gjesdal K.
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1999 Sep 30; 119(23):3441-4. PubMed ID: 10553343
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Critical analysis of a computer-assisted tutorial on ECG interpretation and its ability to determine competency.
    Burke JF, Gnall E, Umrudden Z, Kyaw M, Schick PK.
    Med Teach; 2008 Sep 30; 30(2):e41-8. PubMed ID: 18464131
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The emergency department versus the computer: which is the better electrocardiographer?
    Snyder CS, Fenrich AL, Friedman RA, Macias C, O'Reilly K, Kertesz NJ.
    Pediatr Cardiol; 2003 Sep 30; 24(4):364-8. PubMed ID: 12457259
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Effect of cardiologist ECG review on emergency department practice.
    Todd KH, Hoffman JR, Morgan MT.
    Ann Emerg Med; 1996 Jan 30; 27(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 8572442
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Computerized ECG interpretation.
    Grauer K, Curry RW.
    J Fam Pract; 1992 Aug 30; 35(2):135-6. PubMed ID: 1645105
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Interpretation of immediate exercise treadmill test: interreader reliability between cardiologist and noncardiologist in a chest pain evaluation unit.
    Kirk JD, Turnipseed SD, Diercks DB, London D, Amsterdam EA.
    Ann Emerg Med; 2000 Jul 30; 36(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 10874229
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Utilization of an automated ECG interpretation system in an ambulatory health service.
    Carel RS, Drory Y, Miller H, Kaplinski E.
    Med Prog Technol; 1978 Nov 13; 6(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 366369
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The interpretation of office radiographs by family physicians.
    Halvorsen JG, Kunian A, Gjerdingen D, Connolly J, Koopmeiners M, Cesnik J, Christenson C, Sanderson O.
    J Fam Pract; 1989 Apr 13; 28(4):426-32. PubMed ID: 2703813
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.