These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Electrophysiological spread of excitation and pitch perception for dual and single electrodes using the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant. Busby PA, Battmer RD, Pesch J. Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):853-64. PubMed ID: 18633324 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Temporal Response Properties of the Auditory Nerve in Implanted Children with Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder and Implanted Children with Sensorineural Hearing Loss. He S, Abbas PJ, Doyle DV, McFayden TC, Mulherin S. Ear Hear; 2016 Dec; 37(4):397-411. PubMed ID: 26655913 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Impulse patterns of auditory nerve fibres to extra- and intracochlear electrical stimulation. Hartmann R, Klinke R. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990 Dec; 469():128-34. PubMed ID: 2162619 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Electrode configuration influences action potential initiation site and ensemble stochastic response properties. Miller CA, Abbas PJ, Nourski KV, Hu N, Robinson BK. Hear Res; 2003 Jan; 175(1-2):200-14. PubMed ID: 12527139 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. SpeedCAP: An Efficient Method for Estimating Neural Activation Patterns Using Electrically Evoked Compound Action-Potentials in Cochlear Implant Users. Garcia C, Deeks JM, Goehring T, Borsetto D, Bance M, Carlyon RP. Ear Hear; 2003 Jan; 44(3):627-640. PubMed ID: 36477611 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Electrically evoked auditory nerve compound action potentials in Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant users]. Zhu X, Cao K, Pan T, Yang H, Wang Y. Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2002 Jan; 16(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 11944479 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of intra- versus post-operatively acquired electrically evoked compound action potentials. van Wermeskerken GK, van Olphen AF, van Zanten GA. Int J Audiol; 2006 Oct; 45(10):589-94. PubMed ID: 17062500 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Relationship Between Peripheral and Psychophysical Measures of Amplitude Modulation Detection in Cochlear Implant Users. Tejani VD, Abbas PJ, Brown CJ. Ear Hear; 2017 Oct; 38(5):e268-e284. PubMed ID: 28207576 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Intraoperative Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential Growth and Maximum Amplitudes in Hearing Preservation Cochlear Implant Recipients. Mussoi BS, Woodson E, Sydlowski S. Otol Neurotol; 2023 Apr 01; 44(4):e216-e222. PubMed ID: 36946363 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Adaptation of the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) recorded from nucleus CI24 cochlear implant users. Clay KM, Brown CJ. Ear Hear; 2007 Dec 01; 28(6):850-61. PubMed ID: 17982371 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Extracochlear Stimulation of Electrically Evoked Auditory Brainstem Responses (eABRs) Remains the Preferred Pre-implant Auditory Nerve Function Test in an Assessor-blinded Comparison. Causon A, O'Driscoll M, Stapleton E, Lloyd S, Freeman S, Munro KJ. Otol Neurotol; 2019 Jan 01; 40(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 30489452 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]