These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
715 related items for PubMed ID: 15599192
1. Toward a battery of behavioral and objective measures to achieve optimal cochlear implant stimulation levels in children. Gordon KA, Papsin BC, Harrison RV. Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):447-63. PubMed ID: 15599192 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Programming cochlear implant stimulation levels in infants and children with a combination of objective measures. Gordon K, Papsin BC, Harrison RV. Int J Audiol; 2004 Dec; 43 Suppl 1():S28-32. PubMed ID: 15732379 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Activity-dependent developmental plasticity of the auditory brain stem in children who use cochlear implants. Gordon KA, Papsin BC, Harrison RV. Ear Hear; 2003 Dec; 24(6):485-500. PubMed ID: 14663348 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Evoked stapedius reflex and compound action potential thresholds versus most comfortable loudness level: assessment of their relation for charge-based fitting strategies in implant users. Walkowiak A, Lorens A, Polak M, Kostek B, Skarzynski H, Szkielkowska A, Skarzynski PH. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2011 Dec; 73(4):189-95. PubMed ID: 21659787 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Unilateral cochlear implant use promotes normal-like loudness perception in adolescents with childhood deafness. Steel MM, Abbasalipour P, Salloum CA, Hasek D, Papsin BC, Gordon KA. Ear Hear; 2014 Dec; 35(6):e291-301. PubMed ID: 25072236 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) in cochlear implant children: Changes in auditory nerve response in first year of cochlear implant use. Telmesani LM, Said NM. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Mar; 82():28-33. PubMed ID: 26857311 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Toward a method for programming balanced bilateral cochlear implant stimulation levels in children. Gordon KA, Chaikof MH, Salloum C, Goulding G, Papsin B. Cochlear Implants Int; 2012 Nov; 13(4):220-7. PubMed ID: 22325057 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Evolution of cochlear implant arrays result in changes in behavioral and physiological responses in children. Gordin A, Papsin B, James A, Gordon K. Otol Neurotol; 2009 Oct; 30(7):908-15. PubMed ID: 19730148 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Postoperative objective detecting techniques for cochlear implant children with inner ear malformation. Qiao XF, Li X, Zhang QW, Li TL, Wang D. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Nov; 102():1-6. PubMed ID: 29106852 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Characteristics of electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in patients with cochlear nerve canal stenosis receiving cochlear implants. Wang Z, Liu Y, Wang L, Shen X, Han S, Wang W, Gao F, Liang W, Peng KA. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Jan; 104():98-103. PubMed ID: 29287891 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Using evoked compound action potentials to assess activation of electrodes and predict C-levels in the Tempo+ cochlear implant speech processor. Alvarez I, de la Torre A, Sainz M, Roldán C, Schoesser H, Spitzer P. Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):134-45. PubMed ID: 19838116 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparing eSRT and eCAP measurements in pediatric MED-EL cochlear implant users. Kosaner J, Spitzer P, Bayguzina S, Gultekin M, Behar LA. Cochlear Implants Int; 2018 May; 19(3):153-161. PubMed ID: 29291688 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Electrically evoked amplitude modulation following response in cochlear implant candidates: comparison with auditory nerve response telemetry, subjective electrical stimulation, and speech perception. Hirschfelder A, Gräbel S, Olze H. Otol Neurotol; 2012 Aug; 33(6):968-75. PubMed ID: 22772009 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Electrically evoked auditory nerve compound action potentials in Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant users]. Zhu X, Cao K, Pan T, Yang H, Wang Y. Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2002 Jan; 16(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 11944479 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The pattern of auditory brainstem response wave V maturation in cochlear-implanted children. Thai-Van H, Cozma S, Boutitie F, Disant F, Truy E, Collet L. Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Mar; 118(3):676-89. PubMed ID: 17223382 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds and loudness estimates for the stimuli used to program the Advanced Bionics cochlear implant. Jeon EK, Brown CJ, Etler CP, O'Brien S, Chiou LK, Abbas PJ. J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Jan; 21(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 20085196 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of objective test techniques in cochlear implant users with inner ear malformations. Cinar BC, Atas A, Sennaroglu G, Sennaroglu L. Otol Neurotol; 2011 Sep; 32(7):1065-74. PubMed ID: 21817941 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Packing of the cochleostomy site affects auditory nerve response thresholds in precurved off-stylet cochlear implants. Gordin A, Papsin B, Gordon K. Otol Neurotol; 2010 Feb; 31(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 20101160 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Measurement of electrical evoked middle latency response in cochlear implantation operation]. Wang B, Cao KL, Wang Y, Lu Y. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Mar; 47(3):196-201. PubMed ID: 22805019 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Relationships between electrically evoked potentials and loudness growth in bilateral cochlear implant users. Kirby B, Brown C, Abbas P, Etler C, O'Brien S. Ear Hear; 2012 Mar; 33(3):389-98. PubMed ID: 22246138 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]