These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

200 related items for PubMed ID: 15605865

  • 21. Using current steering to increase spectral resolution in CII and HiRes 90K users.
    Koch DB, Downing M, Osberger MJ, Litvak L.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2 Suppl):38S-41S. PubMed ID: 17496643
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. An introduction to the biophysics of the electrically evoked compound action potential.
    Rubinstein JT.
    Int J Audiol; 2004 Dec; 43 Suppl 1():S3-9. PubMed ID: 15732375
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. An in vitro model for investigating impedance changes with cell growth and electrical stimulation: implications for cochlear implants.
    Newbold C, Richardson R, Huang CQ, Milojevic D, Cowan R, Shepherd R.
    J Neural Eng; 2004 Dec; 1(4):218-27. PubMed ID: 15876642
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Intra- and postoperative electrode impedance of the straight and Contour arrays of the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant: relation to T and C levels.
    van Wermeskerken GK, van Olphen AF, Smoorenburg GF.
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Sep; 45(9):537-44. PubMed ID: 17005497
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Spatial resolution of cochlear implants: the electrical field and excitation of auditory afferents.
    Kral A, Hartmann R, Mortazavi D, Klinke R.
    Hear Res; 1998 Jul; 121(1-2):11-28. PubMed ID: 9682804
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM, Séguin C, Schramm DR, Armstrong S, Chénier J.
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Simulation of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve.
    Rattay F.
    Artif Organs; 1997 Mar; 21(3):213-5. PubMed ID: 9148708
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Assessing the placement of a cochlear electrode array by multidimensional scaling.
    Vanpoucke FJ, Boermans PP, Frijns JH.
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2012 Feb; 59(2):307-10. PubMed ID: 22042122
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Electrode interaction in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of straight and contour electrode arrays.
    Xi X, Ji F, Han D, Hong M, Chen A.
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2009 Feb; 71(4):228-37. PubMed ID: 19707042
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Focused intracochlear electric stimulation with phased array channels.
    van den Honert C, Kelsall DC.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jun; 121(6):3703-16. PubMed ID: 17552721
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. The facial nerve canal: an important cochlear conduction path revealed by Clarion electrical field imaging.
    Vanpoucke F, Zarowski A, Casselman J, Frijns J, Peeters S.
    Otol Neurotol; 2004 May; 25(3):282-9. PubMed ID: 15129106
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.