These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
639 related items for PubMed ID: 15606461
1. Diabetic retinopathy screening using digital non-mydriatic fundus photography and automated image analysis. Hansen AB, Hartvig NV, Jensen MS, Borch-Johnsen K, Lund-Andersen H, Larsen M. Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2004 Dec; 82(6):666-72. PubMed ID: 15606461 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Web-based grading of compressed stereoscopic digital photography versus standard slide film photography for the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy. Rudnisky CJ, Tennant MT, Weis E, Ting A, Hinz BJ, Greve MD. Ophthalmology; 2007 Sep; 114(9):1748-54. PubMed ID: 17368543 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Nonmydriatic ultrawide field retinal imaging compared with dilated standard 7-field 35-mm photography and retinal specialist examination for evaluation of diabetic retinopathy. Silva PS, Cavallerano JD, Sun JK, Noble J, Aiello LM, Aiello LP. Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 Sep; 154(3):549-559.e2. PubMed ID: 22626617 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of mydriasis and different field strategies on digital image screening of diabetic eye disease. Murgatroyd H, Ellingford A, Cox A, Binnie M, Ellis JD, MacEwen CJ, Leese GP. Br J Ophthalmol; 2004 Jul; 88(7):920-4. PubMed ID: 15205238 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of digital retinal image quality among photographers with different levels of training using a non-mydriatic fundus camera. Maberley D, Morris A, Hay D, Chang A, Hall L, Mandava N. Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2004 Jul; 11(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 15370551 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Screening of diabetic retinopathy: effect of field number and mydriasis on sensitivity and specificity of digital fundus photography. Aptel F, Denis P, Rouberol F, Thivolet C. Diabetes Metab; 2008 Jun; 34(3):290-3. PubMed ID: 18406188 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The sensitivity and specificity of single-field nonmydriatic monochromatic digital fundus photography with remote image interpretation for diabetic retinopathy screening: a comparison with ophthalmoscopy and standardized mydriatic color photography. Lin DY, Blumenkranz MS, Brothers RJ, Grosvenor DM. Am J Ophthalmol; 2002 Aug; 134(2):204-13. PubMed ID: 12140027 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of automated fundus photograph analysis algorithms for detecting microaneurysms, haemorrhages and exudates, and of a computer-assisted diagnostic system for grading diabetic retinopathy. Dupas B, Walter T, Erginay A, Ordonez R, Deb-Joardar N, Gain P, Klein JC, Massin P. Diabetes Metab; 2010 Jun; 36(3):213-20. PubMed ID: 20219404 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Can we predict which patients are at risk of having an ungradeable digital image for screening for diabetic retinopathy? Murgatroyd H, Cox A, Ellingford A, Ellis JD, Macewen CJ, Leese GP. Eye (Lond); 2008 Mar; 22(3):344-8. PubMed ID: 17024219 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]