These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


177 related items for PubMed ID: 15607097

  • 1. Relationship between lesion size and signal enhancement on subtraction fat-suppressed MR imaging of the breast.
    Cheung HS, Tse GM, Lai SY, Yeung DK.
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Nov; 22(9):1259-64. PubMed ID: 15607097
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Enhanced mass on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: Lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images.
    Yabuuchi H, Matsuo Y, Okafuji T, Kamitani T, Soeda H, Setoguchi T, Sakai S, Hatakenaka M, Kubo M, Sadanaga N, Yamamoto H, Honda H.
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Nov; 28(5):1157-65. PubMed ID: 18972357
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Non-mass-like enhancement on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images.
    Yabuuchi H, Matsuo Y, Kamitani T, Setoguchi T, Okafuji T, Soeda H, Sakai S, Hatakenaka M, Kubo M, Tokunaga E, Yamamoto H, Honda H.
    Eur J Radiol; 2010 Jul; 75(1):e126-32. PubMed ID: 19796900
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. A combined high temporal and high spatial resolution 3 Tesla MR imaging protocol for the assessment of breast lesions: initial results.
    Pinker K, Grabner G, Bogner W, Gruber S, Szomolanyi P, Trattnig S, Heinz-Peer G, Weber M, Fitzal F, Pluschnig U, Rudas M, Helbich T.
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):553-8. PubMed ID: 19652611
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Evaluation of the three-time-point method for diagnosis of breast lesions in contrast-enhanced MR mammography.
    Hauth EA, Stockamp C, Maderwald S, Mühler A, Kimmig R, Jaeger H, Barkhausen J, Forsting M.
    Clin Imaging; 2006 Sep; 30(3):160-5. PubMed ID: 16632149
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Diagnosis of breast tumors by contrast-enhanced MR imaging: comparison between the diagnostic performance of dynamic enhancement patterns and morphologic features.
    Goto M, Ito H, Akazawa K, Kubota T, Kizu O, Yamada K, Nishimura T.
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Jan; 25(1):104-12. PubMed ID: 17152054
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Gadobenate dimeglumine as a contrast agent for dynamic breast magnetic resonance imaging: effect of higher initial enhancement thresholds on diagnostic performance.
    Sardanelli F, Fausto A, Esseridou A, Di Leo G, Kirchin MA.
    Invest Radiol; 2008 Apr; 43(4):236-42. PubMed ID: 18340247
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Microperfusion-induced elevation of ADC is suppressed after contrast in breast carcinoma.
    Yuen S, Yamada K, Goto M, Nishida K, Takahata A, Nishimura T.
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 May; 29(5):1080-4. PubMed ID: 19388115
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Renal masses: quantitative analysis of enhancement with signal intensity measurements versus qualitative analysis of enhancement with image subtraction for diagnosing malignancy at MR imaging.
    Hecht EM, Israel GM, Krinsky GA, Hahn WY, Kim DC, Belitskaya-Levy I, Lee VS.
    Radiology; 2004 Aug; 232(2):373-8. PubMed ID: 15215544
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Enhancing lesions of the brain: intraindividual crossover comparison of contrast enhancement after gadobenate dimeglumine versus established gadolinium comparators.
    Essig M, Tartaro A, Tartaglione T, Pirovano G, Kirchin MA, Spinazzi A.
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Jun; 13(6):744-51. PubMed ID: 16679277
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Dynamic bilateral contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: trade-off between spatial and temporal resolution.
    Kuhl CK, Schild HH, Morakkabati N.
    Radiology; 2005 Sep; 236(3):789-800. PubMed ID: 16118161
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Chemical shift MRI: is there any contribution to morphologic evaluation of solid breast masses?
    Gokalp G, Topal U, Bolca N, Ercan I.
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Oct; 16(10):1263-71. PubMed ID: 19608436
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Primary breast abnormalities: selective pixel sampling on dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR images.
    Mussurakis S, Gibbs P, Horsman A.
    Radiology; 1998 Feb; 206(2):465-73. PubMed ID: 9457201
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Neural network approach to the segmentation and classification of dynamic magnetic resonance images of the breast: comparison with empiric and quantitative kinetic parameters.
    Szabó BK, Aspelin P, Wiberg MK.
    Acad Radiol; 2004 Dec; 11(12):1344-54. PubMed ID: 15596372
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of breast lesions: first experiences at 3 T.
    Lo GG, Ai V, Chan JK, Li KW, Cheung PS, Wong TT, Ma M, Lee R, Chien D.
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009 Dec; 33(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 19188787
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Handling a high relaxivity contrast material for dynamic breast MR imaging using higher thresholds for the initial enhancement.
    Carbonaro LA, Verardi N, Di Leo G, Sardanelli F.
    Invest Radiol; 2010 Mar; 45(3):114-20. PubMed ID: 20065856
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Use of dynamic phase subtraction (DPS) map in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast.
    Ogura A, Hayakawa K, Yoshida S, Maeda F, Saeki F, Syukutani A.
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2011 Mar; 35(6):749-52. PubMed ID: 22082548
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Three-phase dynamic breast magnetic resonance imaging with two-way subtraction.
    Choi N, Han BK, Choe YH, Kim HS.
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2005 Mar; 29(6):834-41. PubMed ID: 16272861
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Characterization of breast lesions with CE-MR multimodal morphological and kinetic analysis: comparison with conventional mammography and high-resolution ultrasound.
    Vassiou K, Kanavou T, Vlychou M, Poultsidi A, Athanasiou E, Arvanitis DL, Fezoulidis IV.
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 18295425
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.