These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


835 related items for PubMed ID: 15608107

  • 21. Pulsed dye densitometry with two different sensor types for cardiac output measurement after cardiac surgery: a comparison with the thermodilution technique.
    Hofer CK, Bühlmann S, Klaghofer R, Genoni M, Zollinger A.
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2004 May; 48(5):653-7. PubMed ID: 15101865
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Cardiac output measurement after coronary artery bypass grafting using bolus thermodilution, continuous thermodilution, and whole-body impedance cardiography.
    Kaukinen S, Kööbi T, Bi Y, Turjanmaa VM.
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2003 Apr; 17(2):199-203. PubMed ID: 12698402
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Arterial pulse wave analysis: An accurate means of determining cardiac output in children.
    Kim JJ, Dreyer WJ, Chang AC, Breinholt JP, Grifka RG.
    Pediatr Crit Care Med; 2006 Nov; 7(6):532-5. PubMed ID: 17006382
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Continuous invasive cardiac output monitoring--the Baxter/Edwards Critical-Care Swan Ganz IntelliCath and Viligance system.
    Munro HM, Wood CE, Taylor BL, Smith GB.
    Clin Intensive Care; 1994 Nov; 5(2):52-5. PubMed ID: 10147254
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Cardiac output determination from the arterial pressure wave: clinical testing of a novel algorithm that does not require calibration.
    Manecke GR, Auger WR.
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2007 Feb; 21(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 17289472
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Cardiac output measurement by pulse dye densitometry: a comparison with the Fick's principle and thermodilution method.
    Bremer F, Schiele A, Tschaikowsky K.
    Intensive Care Med; 2002 Apr; 28(4):399-405. PubMed ID: 11967592
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Non-invasive measurement of cardiac output in heart failure patients using a new foreign gas rebreathing technique.
    Gabrielsen A, Videbaek R, Schou M, Damgaard M, Kastrup J, Norsk P.
    Clin Sci (Lond); 2002 Feb; 102(2):247-52. PubMed ID: 11834145
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Cardiac index assessment: validation of a new non-invasive very low current thoracic bioimpedance device by thermodilution.
    Faini A, Omboni S, Tifrea M, Bubenek S, Lazar O, Parati G.
    Blood Press; 2014 Apr; 23(2):102-8. PubMed ID: 23926884
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Pulmonary artery thermodilution cardiac output vs. transpulmonary thermodilution cardiac output in two patients with intrathoracic pathology.
    Breukers RB, Jansen JR.
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2004 May; 48(5):658-61. PubMed ID: 15101866
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Lack of agreement between thermodilution and fick methods in the measurement of cardiac output.
    Baylor P.
    J Intensive Care Med; 2006 May; 21(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 16537751
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Noninvasive cardiac output determination using applanation tonometry-derived radial artery pulse contour analysis in critically ill patients.
    Compton F, Wittrock M, Schaefer JH, Zidek W, Tepel M, Scholze A.
    Anesth Analg; 2008 Jan; 106(1):171-4, table of contents. PubMed ID: 18165574
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Effects of injectate volume on thermodilution measurements of cardiac output in patients with low ventricular ejection fraction.
    McCloy K, Leung S, Belden J, Castenada J, Erickson V, Koch K, Livingston N, Moughrabis S, Gawlinski A.
    Am J Crit Care; 1999 Mar; 8(2):86-92. PubMed ID: 10071698
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. A comparison of endotracheal bioimpedance cardiography and transpulmonary thermodilution in cardiac surgery patients.
    Fellahi JL, Fischer MO, Rebet O, Massetti M, Gérard JL, Hanouz JL.
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2012 Apr; 26(2):217-22. PubMed ID: 21880510
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Continuous thermodilution cardiac output: agreement with Fick and bolus thermodilution methods.
    Thrush D, Downs JB, Smith RA.
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 1995 Aug; 9(4):399-404. PubMed ID: 7579109
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Cardiac output measurements with electrical velocimetry in patients undergoing CABG surgery: a comparison with intermittent thermodilution.
    Mekis D, Kamenik M, Starc V, Jeretin S.
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2008 Mar; 25(3):237-42. PubMed ID: 17850685
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Comparison of impedance cardiography to direct Fick and thermodilution cardiac output determination in pulmonary arterial hypertension.
    Yung GL, Fedullo PF, Kinninger K, Johnson W, Channick RN.
    Congest Heart Fail; 2004 Mar; 10(2 Suppl 2):7-10. PubMed ID: 15073478
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. [A comparison of various ways of cardiac output measurement by thermodilution methods].
    Sagara M, Isowaki S, Haraguchi M, Yoshimura N.
    Masui; 1996 Oct; 45(10):1212-5. PubMed ID: 8937016
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. [Measurement of cardiac output after cardiac surgery: validation of a partial carbon dioxide rebreathing (NICO) system in comparison with continuous thermodilution with a pulmonary artery catheter].
    Jover JL, Soro M, Belda FJ, Aguilar G, Caro P, Ferrandis R.
    Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim; 2005 May; 52(5):256-62. PubMed ID: 15968903
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Noninvasive assessment of cardiac output using thoracic electrical bioimpedance in hemodynamically stable and unstable patients after cardiac surgery: a comparison with pulmonary artery thermodilution.
    Suttner S, Schöllhorn T, Boldt J, Mayer J, Röhm KD, Lang K, Piper SN.
    Intensive Care Med; 2006 Dec; 32(12):2053-8. PubMed ID: 17039348
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Impedance cardiography in the measurement of cardiac output: studies in rabbits.
    Pappas CG, Wang X, Connolly RJ, Schwaitzberg SD.
    J Surg Res; 1995 Oct; 59(4):504-10. PubMed ID: 7564325
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 42.