These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
216 related items for PubMed ID: 15610899
1. A direct passive method for measuring water and contaminant fluxes in porous media. Hatfield K, Annable M, Cho J, Rao PS, Klammler H. J Contam Hydrol; 2004 Dec; 75(3-4):155-81. PubMed ID: 15610899 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Passive flux meter measurement of water and nutrient flux in saturated porous media: bench-scale laboratory tests. Cho J, Annable MD, Jawitz JW, Hatfield K. J Environ Qual; 2007 Dec; 36(5):1266-72. PubMed ID: 17636287 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Field-scale evaluation of the passive flux meter for simultaneous measurement of groundwater and contaminant fluxes. Annable MD, Hatfield K, Cho J, Klammler H, Parker BL, Cherry JA, Rao PS. Environ Sci Technol; 2005 Sep 15; 39(18):7194-201. PubMed ID: 16201648 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Oxyanion flux characterization using passive flux meters: development and field testing of surfactant-modified granular activated carbon. Lee J, Rao PS, Poyer IC, Toole RM, Annable MD, Hatfield K. J Contam Hydrol; 2007 Jul 17; 92(3-4):208-29. PubMed ID: 17316893 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of two innovative methods to measure contaminant mass flux in groundwater. Goltz MN, Close ME, Yoon H, Huang J, Flintoft MJ, Kim S, Enfield C. J Contam Hydrol; 2009 Apr 15; 106(1-2):51-61. PubMed ID: 19215996 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of temporally variable groundwater flow conditions on point measurements and contaminant mass flux estimations. Rein A, Bauer S, Dietrich P, Beyer C. J Contam Hydrol; 2009 Sep 01; 108(3-4):118-33. PubMed ID: 19682766 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Magnitude and directional measures of water and Cr(VI) fluxes by passive flux meter. Campbell TJ, Hatfield K, Klammler H, Annable MD, Rao PS. Environ Sci Technol; 2006 Oct 15; 40(20):6392-7. PubMed ID: 17120570 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Redistribution of contaminants by a fluctuating water table in a micro-porous, double-porosity aquifer: field observations and model simulations. Fretwell BA, Burgess WG, Barker JA, Jefferies NL. J Contam Hydrol; 2005 Jun 15; 78(1-2):27-52. PubMed ID: 15949606 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. New methodology to investigate potential contaminant mass fluxes at the stream-aquifer interface by combining integral pumping tests and streambed temperatures. Kalbus E, Schmidt C, Bayer-Raich M, Leschik S, Reinstorf F, Balcke GU, Schirmer M. Environ Pollut; 2007 Aug 15; 148(3):808-16. PubMed ID: 17399875 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Mass discharge assessment at a brominated DNAPL site: Effects of known DNAPL source mass removal. Johnston CD, Davis GB, Bastow TP, Woodbury RJ, Rao PS, Annable MD, Rhodes S. J Contam Hydrol; 2014 Aug 15; 164():100-13. PubMed ID: 24973505 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Integral quantification of contaminant mass flow rates in a contaminated aquifer: conditioning of the numerical inversion of concentration-time series. Herold M, Ptak T, Bayer-Raich M, Wendel T, Grathwohl P. J Contam Hydrol; 2009 Apr 15; 106(1-2):29-38. PubMed ID: 19167131 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]