These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

347 related items for PubMed ID: 15617947

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparing treatment effects after adjustment with multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression and propensity score methods.
    Martens EP, de Boer A, Pestman WR, Belitser SV, Stricker BH, Klungel OH.
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2008 Jan; 17(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 17960554
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Quantitative assessment of unobserved confounding is mandatory in nonrandomized intervention studies.
    Groenwold RH, Hak E, Hoes AW.
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jan; 62(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 18619797
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Advanced statistics: the propensity score--a method for estimating treatment effect in observational research.
    Newgard CD, Hedges JR, Arthur M, Mullins RJ.
    Acad Emerg Med; 2004 Sep; 11(9):953-61. PubMed ID: 15347546
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Adjustment for multiple cardiovascular risk factors using a summary risk score.
    Arbogast PG, Kaltenbach L, Ding H, Ray WA.
    Epidemiology; 2008 Jan; 19(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 18091000
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Effects of long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution on respiratory and cardiovascular mortality in the Netherlands: the NLCS-AIR study.
    Brunekreef B, Beelen R, Hoek G, Schouten L, Bausch-Goldbohm S, Fischer P, Armstrong B, Hughes E, Jerrett M, van den Brandt P.
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2009 Mar; (139):5-71; discussion 73-89. PubMed ID: 19554969
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Assessing the sensitivity of regression results to unmeasured confounders in observational studies.
    Lin DY, Psaty BM, Kronmal RA.
    Biometrics; 1998 Sep; 54(3):948-63. PubMed ID: 9750244
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Two-stage instrumental variable methods for estimating the causal odds ratio: analysis of bias.
    Cai B, Small DS, Have TR.
    Stat Med; 2011 Jul 10; 30(15):1809-24. PubMed ID: 21495062
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Interpreting treatment-effect estimates with heterogeneity and choice: simulation model results.
    Brooks JM, Fang G.
    Clin Ther; 2009 Apr 10; 31(4):902-19. PubMed ID: 19446162
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Addressing the issue of channeling bias in observational studies with propensity scores analysis.
    Lobo FS, Wagner S, Gross CR, Schommer JC.
    Res Social Adm Pharm; 2006 Mar 10; 2(1):143-51. PubMed ID: 17138506
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Adjusting for bias and unmeasured confounding in Mendelian randomization studies with binary responses.
    Palmer TM, Thompson JR, Tobin MD, Sheehan NA, Burton PR.
    Int J Epidemiol; 2008 Oct 10; 37(5):1161-8. PubMed ID: 18463132
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 18.