These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


274 related items for PubMed ID: 15621317

  • 1. Quantification of isometric cervical strength at different ranges of flexion and extension.
    Suryanarayana L, Kumar S.
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2005 Feb; 20(2):138-44. PubMed ID: 15621317
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Validation of an EMG-driven, graphically based isometric musculoskeletal model of the cervical spine.
    Netto KJ, Burnett AF, Green JP, Rodrigues JP.
    J Biomech Eng; 2008 Jun; 130(3):031014. PubMed ID: 18532863
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Evaluation of neck muscle strength with a modified sphygmomanometer dynamometer: reliability and validity.
    Vernon HT, Aker P, Aramenko M, Battershill D, Alepin A, Penner T.
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1992 Jun; 15(6):343-9. PubMed ID: 1431617
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Simulated malingering in the testing of cervical muscle isometric strength.
    Vernon H, Tran S, Soave D, Moreton J.
    J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil; 2010 Jun; 23(3):117-27. PubMed ID: 20858941
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Cervical strength of young adults in sagittal, coronal, and intermediate planes.
    Kumar S, Narayan Y, Amell T.
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2001 Jun; 16(5):380-8. PubMed ID: 11390044
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Cervical muscle strength measurement in two groups of elite Greco-Roman and free style wrestlers and a group of non-athletic subjects.
    Rezasoltani A, Ahmadi A, Nehzate-Khoshroh M, Forohideh F, Ylinen J.
    Br J Sports Med; 2005 Jul; 39(7):440-3; discussion 440-3. PubMed ID: 15976167
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Cervical muscle strength measurement is dependent on the location of thoracic support.
    Rezasoltani A, Ylinen J, Bakhtiary AH, Norozi M, Montazeri M.
    Br J Sports Med; 2008 May; 42(5):379-82. PubMed ID: 18070800
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Maximal force, force/time and activation/coactivation characteristics of the neck muscles in extension and flexion in healthy men and women at different ages.
    Valkeinen H, Ylinen J, Mälkiä E, Alen M, Häkkinen K.
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2002 Dec; 88(3):247-54. PubMed ID: 12458368
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Cervical segmental motion induced by shoulder abduction assessed by magnetic resonance imaging.
    Takasaki H, Hall T, Kaneko S, Iizawa T, Ikemoto Y.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Feb 01; 34(3):E122-6. PubMed ID: 19179912
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Muscle specificity in tests of cervical flexor muscle performance.
    O'Leary S, Falla D, Jull G, Vicenzino B.
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2007 Feb 01; 17(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 16423538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Association of neck pain, disability and neck pain during maximal effort with neck muscle strength and range of movement in women with chronic non-specific neck pain.
    Ylinen J, Takala EP, Kautiainen H, Nykänen M, Häkkinen A, Pohjolainen T, Karppi SL, Airaksinen O.
    Eur J Pain; 2004 Oct 01; 8(5):473-8. PubMed ID: 15324778
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Flight-training effect on the cervical muscle isometric strength of trainee pilots.
    Burnett AF, Naumann FL, Burton EJ.
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2004 Jul 01; 75(7):611-5. PubMed ID: 15267083
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Differences in isometric neck muscle strength between healthy controls and women with chronic neck pain: the use of a reliable measurement.
    Cagnie B, Cools A, De Loose V, Cambier D, Danneels L.
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Nov 01; 88(11):1441-5. PubMed ID: 17964885
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Do flexion/extension postures affect the in vivo passive lumbar spine response to applied axial twist moments?
    Drake JD, Callaghan JP.
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2008 Jun 01; 23(5):510-9. PubMed ID: 18234402
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. A comparison of training methods to increase neck muscle strength.
    Burnett AF, Naumann FL, Price RS, Sanders RH.
    Work; 2005 Jun 01; 25(3):205-10. PubMed ID: 16179769
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Normal cervical spine range of motion in children 3-12 years old.
    Arbogast KB, Gholve PA, Friedman JE, Maltese MR, Tomasello MF, Dormans JP.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May 01; 32(10):E309-15. PubMed ID: 17471079
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Cervical muscles weakness in chronic whiplash patients.
    Prushansky T, Gepstein R, Gordon C, Dvir Z.
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2005 Oct 01; 20(8):794-8. PubMed ID: 15996800
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Errors in precise examiner head placement during cervical range-of-motion measurements.
    Chen J, Lantz CA, Solinger AB.
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2001 Jun 01; 24(5):327-30. PubMed ID: 11416822
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Mobility, muscular strength and endurance in the cervical spine in Swedish Air Force pilots.
    Alricsson M, Harms-Ringdahl K, Schüldt K, Ekholm J, Linder J.
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2001 Apr 01; 72(4):336-42. PubMed ID: 11318012
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Standardized initial head position in cervical range-of-motion assessment: reliability and error analysis.
    Solinger AB, Chen J, Lantz CA.
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2000 Jan 01; 23(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 10658872
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.