These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
392 related items for PubMed ID: 15622265
1. A randomized, evaluator-blind, multicenter comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of Perlane versus Zyplast in the correction of nasolabial folds. Lindqvist C, Tveten S, Bondevik BE, Fagrell D. Plast Reconstr Surg; 2005 Jan; 115(1):282-9. PubMed ID: 15622265 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A randomized, double-blind, multicenter comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of Restylane versus Zyplast for the correction of nasolabial folds. Narins RS, Brandt F, Leyden J, Lorenc ZP, Rubin M, Smith S. Dermatol Surg; 2003 Jun; 29(6):588-95. PubMed ID: 12786700 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Randomized, double-blind comparison of the efficacy of two hyaluronic acid derivatives, restylane perlane and hylaform, in the treatment of nasolabial folds. Carruthers A, Carey W, De Lorenzi C, Remington K, Schachter D, Sapra S. Dermatol Surg; 2005 Nov; 31(11 Pt 2):1591-8; discussion 1598. PubMed ID: 16416643 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Persistence and improvement of nasolabial fold correction with nonanimal-stabilized hyaluronic acid 100,000 gel particles/mL filler on two retreatment schedules: results up to 18 months on two retreatment schedules. Narins RS, Dayan SH, Brandt FS, Baldwin EK. Dermatol Surg; 2008 Jun; 34 Suppl 1():S2-8; discussion S8. PubMed ID: 18547177 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A double-blind, clinical evaluation of facial augmentation treatments: a comparison of PRI 1, PRI 2, Zyplast and Perlane. Downie J, Mao Z, Rachel Lo TW, Barry S, Bock M, Siebert JP, Bowman A, Ayoub A. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2009 Dec; 62(12):1636-43. PubMed ID: 18986859 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A randomized, prospective, blinded, split-face, single-center study comparing polycaprolactone to hyaluronic acid for treatment of nasolabial folds. Galadari H, van Abel D, Al Nuami K, Al Faresi F, Galadari I. J Cosmet Dermatol; 2015 Mar; 14(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 25564797 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Lidocaine-Containing Monophasic Hyaluronic Acid Filler for Nasolabial Folds. Joo HJ, Woo YJ, Kim JE, Kim BJ, Kang H. Plast Reconstr Surg; 2016 Mar; 137(3):799-808. PubMed ID: 26910660 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Safety and effectiveness of small and large gel-particle hyaluronic acid in the correction of perioral wrinkles. Brandt F, Bassichis B, Bassichis M, O'Connell C, Lin X. J Drugs Dermatol; 2011 Sep; 10(9):982-7. PubMed ID: 22052266 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. ArteFill: a long-lasting injectable wrinkle filler material--summary of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration trials and a progress report on 4- to 5-year outcomes. Cohen SR, Berner CF, Busso M, Gleason MC, Hamilton D, Holmes RE, Romano JJ, Rullan PP, Thaler MP, Ubogy Z, Vecchione TR. Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 Sep; 118(3 Suppl):64S-76S. PubMed ID: 16936546 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Juvéderm injectable gel: a multicenter, double-blind, randomized study of safety and effectiveness. Pinsky MA, Thomas JA, Murphy DK, Walker PS, Juvéderm vs. Zyplast Nasolabial Fold Study Group. Aesthet Surg J; 2008 Sep; 28(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 19083502 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Efficacy and safety of a new hyaluronic acid dermal filler in the treatment of severe nasolabial lines - 6-month interim results of a randomized, evaluator-blinded, intra-individual comparison study. Ascher B, Bayerl C, Brun P, Kestemont P, Rzany B, Poncet M, Guennoun M, Podda M. J Cosmet Dermatol; 2011 Jun; 10(2):94-8. PubMed ID: 21649813 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A randomized, evaluator-blinded comparison of efficacy of hyaluronic acid gel and avian-sourced hylan B plus gel for correction of nasolabial folds. Beer K. Dermatol Surg; 2007 Aug; 33(8):928-36. PubMed ID: 17661935 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Safety of nonanimal stabilized hyaluronic acid dermal fillers in patients with skin of color: a randomized, evaluator-blinded comparative trial. Taylor SC, Burgess CM, Callender VD. Dermatol Surg; 2009 Oct; 35 Suppl 2():1653-60. PubMed ID: 19807760 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A two-stage phase I trial of Evolence30 collagen for soft-tissue contour correction. Monstrey SJ, Pitaru S, Hamdi M, Van Landuyt K, Blondeel P, Shiri J, Goldlust A, Shoshani D. Plast Reconstr Surg; 2007 Jul; 120(1):303-311. PubMed ID: 17572579 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A randomized, multicenter study of the safety and efficacy of Dermicol-P35 and non-animal-stabilized hyaluronic acid gel for the correction of nasolabial folds. Narins RS, Brandt FS, Lorenc ZP, Maas CS, Monheit GD, Smith SR, McIntyre S. Dermatol Surg; 2007 Dec; 33 Suppl 2():S213-21; discussion S221. PubMed ID: 18086061 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Effectiveness of Juvéderm Ultra Plus dermal filler in the treatment of severe nasolabial folds. Lupo MP, Smith SR, Thomas JA, Murphy DK, Beddingfield FC. Plast Reconstr Surg; 2008 Jan; 121(1):289-297. PubMed ID: 18176233 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Efficacy and safety of a new hyaluronic acid dermal filler in the treatment of moderate nasolabial folds: 6-month interim results of a randomized, evaluator-blinded, intra-individual comparison study. Rzany B, Bayerl C, Bodokh I, Boineau D, Dirschka T, Queille-Roussel C, Sebastian M, Sommer B, Poncet M, Guennoun M, Podda M. J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2011 Jun; 13(3):107-12. PubMed ID: 21609212 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]