These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
264 related items for PubMed ID: 15623878
1. Biological and physical dosimetry for radiation protection. Stather JW, Hopewell J, Pihet P. Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 112(4):455-6. PubMed ID: 15623878 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Dose quantities in radiation protection and their limitations. Dietze G, Menzel HG. Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 112(4):457-63. PubMed ID: 15623879 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Investigation on the relationship between dose and energy response of the photon radiation in film dosimetry. Bojtor I. Acta Biochim Biophys Acad Sci Hung; 1971; 6(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 5117481 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Occupational exposure to ionising radiation with thermoluminescence dosimetry system in Turkey, in 2003. Zeyrek CT, Gündüz H. Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 113(4):374-80. PubMed ID: 15797921 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Thermoluminescent dosimetry monitoring system for the national reactor testing station. Cipperley FV. Health Phys; 1966 Nov; 12(11):1637-8. PubMed ID: 5971954 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [The department of protection evaluation and dosimetry of the Institute of Radiology of the University of Palermo]. Laconi A. Minerva Med; 1972 Nov 03; 63(78):4229-44. PubMed ID: 5081749 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Usefulness and limits of biological dosimetry based on cytogenetic methods. Léonard A, Rueff J, Gerber GB, Léonard ED. Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005 Nov 03; 115(1-4):448-54. PubMed ID: 16381765 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Extended conversion coefficients for use in radiation protection of the embryo and fetus against external neutrons from 10 MeV to 100 GeV. Chen J. Health Phys; 2006 Mar 03; 90(3):223-31. PubMed ID: 16505619 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Biological and physical dosimetry for radiation protection. Proceedings of a symposium. March 10, 2004. Braunschweig, Germany. Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004 Mar 03; 112(4):455-539. PubMed ID: 15747394 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Why can't we find a better biological indicator of dose? Voisin P, Roy L, Benderitter M. Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004 Mar 03; 112(4):465-9. PubMed ID: 15623880 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Radiation and chemical degradation of UVR protection characteristics of fabrics. Khazova M, O'Hagan JB, Grainger KJ. Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007 Mar 03; 123(3):369-77. PubMed ID: 17065196 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Intercalibration of dosimeters on film in Italian services of the personnel dosimetry]. Busuoli G, Cavallini A. Minerva Fisiconucl; 1971 Mar 03; 15(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 5566451 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Evaluation of physical radiation protection control: personal dosimetry methods]. Wachsmann F. Strahlenschutz Forsch Prax; 1976 Mar 03; 15():77-85. PubMed ID: 936247 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Dosimetry for members of the extended Techa River cohort. Anspaugh LR, Degteva MO, Vorobiova MI, Mokrov YG, Napier BA. Health Phys; 2006 Oct 03; 91(4):393-4. PubMed ID: 16966885 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Ionizing radiations in the environment: problems of dosimetry, biological damage and protection]. Calapaj GG. Ann Sanita Pubblica; 1966 Oct 03; 27(6):1169-231 concl. PubMed ID: 4862560 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]