These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

188 related items for PubMed ID: 15636754

  • 1. Microbiological carcass sampling methods to achieve compliance with 2001/471/EC and new hygiene regulations.
    Byrne B, Dunne G, Lyng J, Bolton DJ.
    Res Microbiol; 2005; 156(1):104-6. PubMed ID: 15636754
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Excision vs sponge swabbing - a comparison of methods for the microbiological sampling of beef, pork and lamb carcasses.
    Pearce RA, Bolton DJ.
    J Appl Microbiol; 2005; 98(4):896-900. PubMed ID: 15752336
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Microbiological sampling of swine carcasses: a comparison of data obtained by swabbing with medical gauze and data collected routinely by excision at Swedish abattoirs.
    Lindblad M.
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2007 Sep 15; 118(2):180-5. PubMed ID: 17706823
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Microbiological sampling of carcasses by excision or swabbing with three types of sponge or gauze.
    Martínez B, Celda MF, Anastasio B, García I, López-Mendoza MC.
    J Food Prot; 2010 Jan 15; 73(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 20051208
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Microbial contamination on beef in relation to hygiene assessment based on criteria used in EU Decision 2001/471/EC.
    McEvoy JM, Sheridan JJ, Blair IS, McDowell DA.
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2004 Apr 15; 92(2):217-25. PubMed ID: 15109799
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The development of a 'clean sheep policy' in compliance with the new Hygiene Regulation (EC) 853/2004 (Hygiene 2).
    Byrne B, Dunne G, Lyng J, Bolton DJ.
    Food Microbiol; 2007 May 15; 24(3):301-4. PubMed ID: 17188209
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A comparison of wet-dry swabbing and excision sampling methods for microbiological testing of bovine, porcine, and ovine carcasses at red meat slaughterhouses.
    Hutchison ML, Walters LD, Avery SM, Reid CA, Wilson D, Howell M, Johnston AM, Buncic S.
    J Food Prot; 2005 Oct 15; 68(10):2155-62. PubMed ID: 16245723
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [The use of neck skin for microbial process control of fresh poultry meat using the bioluminescence method].
    Ellerbroek L, Lox C.
    Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2004 May 15; 111(5):181-4. PubMed ID: 15233334
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Relevance of abattoir hygiene assessment to microbial contamination of British beef carcases.
    Hudson WR, Mead GC, Hinton MH.
    Vet Rec; 1996 Dec 14; 139(24):587-9. PubMed ID: 8981733
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Trends in the microbial contamination of bovine, ovine and swine carcasses in three small-scale abattoirs in central Italy: A four-year monitoring.
    Petruzzelli A, Osimani A, Pasquini M, Clementi F, Vetrano V, Paolini F, Foglini M, Micci E, Paoloni A, Tonucci F.
    Meat Sci; 2016 Jan 14; 111():53-9. PubMed ID: 26340741
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Experimental comparison of excision and swabbing microbiological sampling methods for carcasses.
    Pepperell R, Reid CA, Solano SN, Hutchison ML, Walters LD, Johnston AM, Buncic S.
    J Food Prot; 2005 Oct 14; 68(10):2163-8. PubMed ID: 16245724
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Microbiological contamination of cattle carcasses at different stages of slaughter in two abattoirs.
    Zweifel C, Capek M, Stephan R.
    Meat Sci; 2014 Oct 14; 98(2):198-202. PubMed ID: 24967539
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Microbiological contamination of reindeer carcass during slaughter.
    Vaarala A, Korkeala H.
    Acta Vet Scand; 1994 Oct 14; 35(4):383-8. PubMed ID: 7676921
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Assessment of bacterial superficial contamination in classical or ritually slaughtered cattle using metagenetics and microbiological analysis.
    Korsak N, Taminiau B, Hupperts C, Delhalle L, Nezer C, Delcenserie V, Daube G.
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2017 Apr 17; 247():79-86. PubMed ID: 27756497
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Microbiological contamination of cattle and pig carcasses at five abattoirs determined by swab sampling in accordance with EU Decision 2001/471/EC.
    Zweifel C, Baltzer D, Stephan R.
    Meat Sci; 2005 Mar 17; 69(3):559-66. PubMed ID: 22062996
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The relationship between hide cleanliness and bacterial numbers on beef carcasses at a commercial abattoir.
    McEvoy JM, Doherty AM, Finnerty M, Sheridan JJ, McGuire L, Blair IS, McDowell DA, Harrington D.
    Lett Appl Microbiol; 2000 May 17; 30(5):390-5. PubMed ID: 10792669
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Prevalence of enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli from serotype O157 and other attaching and effacing Escherichia coli on bovine carcasses in Algeria.
    Chahed A, China B, Mainil J, Daube G.
    J Appl Microbiol; 2006 Aug 17; 101(2):361-8. PubMed ID: 16882143
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparison of aerial counts at different sites in beef and sheep abattoirs and the relationship between aerial and beef carcass contamination.
    Okraszska-Lasica W, Bolton DJ, Sheridan JJ, McDowell DA.
    Food Microbiol; 2012 Dec 17; 32(2):325-31. PubMed ID: 22986197
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Microbial assessment of an upward and downward dehiding technique in a commercial beef processing plant.
    Kennedy TG, Giotis ES, McKevitt AI.
    Meat Sci; 2014 Aug 17; 97(4):486-9. PubMed ID: 24769148
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of destructive and nondestructive sampling techniques of retail chicken carcasses for enumeration of hygiene indicator microorganisms.
    Cossi MV, de Almeida MV, Dias MR, de Arruda Pinto PS, Nero LA.
    J Food Prot; 2012 Jan 17; 75(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 22221352
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.