These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
218 related items for PubMed ID: 1563939
1. Viewing the "Draft guidelines for state court decision making in authorizing or withdrawing life-sustaining medical treatment" from the perspective of related areas of law and economics: a critique. Gorby JD. Issues Law Med; 1992; 7(4):477-510. PubMed ID: 1563939 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Guidelines for state court decision making in life-sustaining medical treatment cases. Hafemeister TL. Issues Law Med; 1992; 7(4):443-75. PubMed ID: 1563938 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Decisionmaking in authorizing and withholding life sustaining medical treatment: from Quinlan to Cruzan. Keilitz I, Bilzor JC, Hafemeister TL, Brown V, Dudyshyn D. Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1989; 13(5):482-93. PubMed ID: 11654759 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Evolving Delaware law on the termination of life-sustaining treatment. Hayman S. Del Med J; 1987 Mar; 59(3):205-8, 213-4. PubMed ID: 3569614 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The due process "right to life" in Cruzan and its impact on "right-to-die" law. Bopp J, Avila D. Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1991 Mar; 53(1):193-233. PubMed ID: 11652639 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Right-to-die damage actions: developments in the law. Miller DH. Denver Univ Law Rev; 1988 Mar; 65(2-3):181-212. PubMed ID: 11659201 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The state's interest in the preservation of life: from Quinlan to Cruzan. Peters PG. Ohio State Law J; 1989 Mar; 50(4):891-977. PubMed ID: 16044607 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Finding agreement to limit life-sustaining treatment for children who are in state custody. Savage T, Michalak DR. Pediatr Nurs; 2001 Mar; 27(6):594-7. PubMed ID: 12024533 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Abortion and the right to die: judicial imposition of a theory of life. Prygoski PJ. Seton Hall Law Rev; 1992 Mar; 23(1):67-120. PubMed ID: 11656225 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Accepting the consequences of a treatment-refusal decision. Moore DL. Bioeth Bull; 1995 Mar; 4(2):13-7. PubMed ID: 11822418 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The right to refuse life-sustaining medical treatment: national trend and recent changes in Maryland law. Goldmeier KE. MD Law Rev; 1994 Mar; 53(4):1306-43. PubMed ID: 12599354 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Equality for the elderly incompetent: a proposal for dignified death. Merritt TL. Stanford Law Rev; 1987 Feb; 39(3):689-736. PubMed ID: 10281165 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. When vitalism is dead wrong: the discrimination against and torture of incompetent patients by compulsory life-sustaining treatment. Ouellette AR. Indiana Law J; 2004 Feb; 79(1):1-55. PubMed ID: 16189901 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Death by default. Lindgren J. Law Contemp Probl; 1993 Feb; 56(3):185-254. PubMed ID: 10129268 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Whose rite is it anyway?: the search for a constitutional permit to die. Berman MB. Southwest Univ Law Rev; 1992 Feb; 22(1):105-58. PubMed ID: 11656255 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A matter of life and death: pregnancy clauses in living will statutes. Dyke MC. Boston Univ Law Rev; 1990 Nov; 70(5):867-87. PubMed ID: 12186075 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Borrowed lessons: the role of ethical distinctions in framing law on life-sustaining treatment. Capron AM. Ariz State Law J; 1984 Nov; 1984(4):647-60. PubMed ID: 16184674 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Death and life decisions: who is in control? Kenney SC. Loyola Los Angel Law Rev; 1990 Apr; 23(3):791-828. PubMed ID: 11652584 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Living will statutes: the first decade. Gelfand G. Wis L Rev; 1987 Apr; 5(5):737-822. PubMed ID: 11650367 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The role of state legislatures after Cruzan: what can--and should--state legislatures do? Rouse F. Law Med Health Care; 1991 Apr; 19(1-2):83-90. PubMed ID: 1895773 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]