These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1102 related items for PubMed ID: 15659468

  • 1. Prenatal risk factors for Caesarean section. Analyses of the ALSPAC cohort of 12,944 women in England.
    Patel RR, Peters TJ, Murphy DJ, ALSPAC Study Team.
    Int J Epidemiol; 2005 Apr; 34(2):353-67. PubMed ID: 15659468
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Short-term maternal and neonatal outcomes by mode of delivery. A case-controlled study.
    Benedetto C, Marozio L, Prandi G, Roccia A, Blefari S, Fabris C.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2007 Nov; 135(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 17126475
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women.
    Vrouenraets FP, Roumen FJ, Dehing CJ, van den Akker ES, Aarts MJ, Scheve EJ.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 105(4):690-7. PubMed ID: 15802392
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Impact of first childbirth on changes in women's preference for mode of delivery: follow-up of a longitudinal observational study.
    Pang MW, Leung TN, Lau TK, Hang Chung TK.
    Birth; 2008 Jun; 35(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 18507583
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. How much influence do women in Sweden have on caesarean section? A follow-up study of women's preferences in early pregnancy.
    Hildingsson I.
    Midwifery; 2008 Mar; 24(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 17197058
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Term breech presentation in The Netherlands from 1995 to 1999: mortality and morbidity in relation to the mode of delivery of 33824 infants.
    Rietberg CC, Elferink-Stinkens PM, Brand R, van Loon AJ, Van Hemel OJ, Visser GH.
    BJOG; 2003 Jun; 110(6):604-9. PubMed ID: 12798480
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Maternal hypothyroidism in early and late gestation: effects on neonatal and obstetric outcome.
    Idris I, Srinivasan R, Simm A, Page RC.
    Clin Endocrinol (Oxf); 2005 Nov; 63(5):560-5. PubMed ID: 16268809
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Maternal anthropometric risk factors for caesarean delivery before or after onset of labour.
    Sherrard A, Platt RW, Vallerand D, Usher RH, Zhang X, Kramer MS.
    BJOG; 2007 Sep; 114(9):1088-96. PubMed ID: 17617199
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Caesarean delivery at full cervical dilatation versus caesarean delivery in the first stage of labour: comparison of maternal and perinatal morbidity.
    Selo-Ojeme D, Sathiyathasan S, Fayyaz M.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2008 Sep; 278(3):245-9. PubMed ID: 18189142
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Planned caesarean section decreases the risk of adverse perinatal outcome due to both labour and delivery complications in the Term Breech Trial.
    Su M, Hannah WJ, Willan A, Ross S, Hannah ME, Term Breech Trial collaborative group.
    BJOG; 2004 Oct; 111(10):1065-74. PubMed ID: 15383108
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Maternal body mass index at delivery and risk of caesarean due to dystocia in low risk pregnancies.
    Roman H, Goffinet F, Hulsey TF, Newman R, Robillard PY, Hulsey TC.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008 Oct; 87(2):163-70. PubMed ID: 18231883
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Cohort study of operative delivery in the second stage of labour and standard of obstetric care.
    Murphy DJ, Liebling RE, Patel R, Verity L, Swingler R.
    BJOG; 2003 Jun; 110(6):610-5. PubMed ID: 12798481
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Cesarean delivery in Finland: maternal complications and obstetric risk factors.
    Pallasmaa N, Ekblad U, Aitokallio-Tallberg A, Uotila J, Raudaskoski T, Ulander VM, Hurme S.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010 Jul; 89(7):896-902. PubMed ID: 20583935
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Predictors for caesarean delivery and neonatal admission after trial of labour in women with one previous lower segment caesarean scar.
    Tan PC, Subramaniam RN, Omar SZ.
    Singapore Med J; 2008 Mar; 49(3):188-92. PubMed ID: 18362998
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Risk of maternal and neonatal complications in subsequent pregnancy after planned caesarean section in a first birth, compared with emergency caesarean section: a nationwide comparative cohort study.
    Kok N, Ruiter L, Hof M, Ravelli A, Mol BW, Pajkrt E, Kazemier B.
    BJOG; 2014 Jan; 121(2):216-23. PubMed ID: 24373595
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Vaginal birth after one previous caesarean section in a tertiary institution in Nigeria.
    Aisien AO, Oronsaye AU.
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Nov; 24(8):886-90. PubMed ID: 16147643
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Emergency cesarean delivery in induction of labor: an evaluation of risk factors.
    Cnattingius R, Höglund B, Kieler H.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 May; 84(5):456-62. PubMed ID: 15842210
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Effects of prolonged second stage, method of birth, timing of caesarean section and other obstetric risk factors on postnatal urinary incontinence: an Australian nulliparous cohort study.
    Brown SJ, Gartland D, Donath S, MacArthur C.
    BJOG; 2011 Jul; 118(8):991-1000. PubMed ID: 21489125
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Elective induction vs. spontaneous labor associations and outcomes.
    Glantz JC.
    J Reprod Med; 2005 Apr; 50(4):235-40. PubMed ID: 15916205
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Absence of conception after caesarean section: voluntary or involuntary?
    Bhattacharya S, Porter M, Harrild K, Naji A, Mollison J, van Teijlingen E, Campbell DM, Hall MH, Templeton A.
    BJOG; 2006 Mar; 113(3):268-75. PubMed ID: 16487197
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 56.