These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

466 related items for PubMed ID: 15660265

  • 1. Prognostic value of some ovarian reserve tests in poor responders.
    Vladimirov IK, Tacheva DM, Kalinov KB, Ivanova AV, Blagoeva VD.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2005 Jun; 272(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 15660265
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Repeated clomiphene citrate challenge testing in the prediction of outcome in IVF: a comparison with basal markers for ovarian reserve.
    Hendriks DJ, Broekmans FJ, Bancsi LF, de Jong FH, Looman CW, Te Velde ER.
    Hum Reprod; 2005 Jan; 20(1):163-9. PubMed ID: 15471926
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [Prognostic value of some hormonal and ultrasound ovarian reserve tests].
    Vladimirov Ia, Tacheva D, Blagoeva V.
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2003 Jan; 42(5):14-20. PubMed ID: 14682007
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Value of serum inhibin B measurement in predicting ovarian response in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for in vitro fertilization cycle].
    Chen Y, Yu Q, Zhang YW, He FF, Sun ZY.
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Jun; 41(6):368-71. PubMed ID: 16831355
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of basal and clomiphene citrate induced FSH and inhibin B, ovarian volume and antral follicle counts as ovarian reserve tests and predictors of poor ovarian response in IVF.
    Erdem M, Erdem A, Gursoy R, Biberoglu K.
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2004 Feb; 21(2):37-45. PubMed ID: 15186020
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Evaluation of anti-Müllerian hormone as a test for the prediction of ovarian reserve.
    Kwee J, Schats R, McDonnell J, Themmen A, de Jong F, Lambalk C.
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Sep; 90(3):737-43. PubMed ID: 17923131
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Anti-Mullerian hormone is a better marker than inhibin B, follicle stimulating hormone, estradiol or antral follicle count in predicting the outcome of in vitro fertilization.
    Kunt C, Ozaksit G, Keskin Kurt R, Cakir Gungor AN, Kanat-Pektas M, Kilic S, Dede A.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Jun; 283(6):1415-21. PubMed ID: 21562964
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Prospective analysis of the relationships between the ovarian follicle cohort and basal FSH concentration, the inhibin response to exogenous FSH and ovarian follicle number at different stages of the normal menstrual cycle and after pituitary down-regulation.
    Yong PY, Baird DT, Thong KJ, McNeilly AS, Anderson RA.
    Hum Reprod; 2003 Jan; 18(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 12525438
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. A systematic review of tests predicting ovarian reserve and IVF outcome.
    Broekmans FJ, Kwee J, Hendriks DJ, Mol BW, Lambalk CB.
    Hum Reprod Update; 2006 Jan; 12(6):685-718. PubMed ID: 16891297
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Predictors of poor ovarian response in in vitro fertilization: a prospective study comparing basal markers of ovarian reserve.
    Bancsi LF, Broekmans FJ, Eijkemans MJ, de Jong FH, Habbema JD, te Velde ER.
    Fertil Steril; 2002 Feb; 77(2):328-36. PubMed ID: 11821092
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. A prospective, comparative analysis of anti-Müllerian hormone, inhibin-B, and three-dimensional ultrasound determinants of ovarian reserve in the prediction of poor response to controlled ovarian stimulation.
    Jayaprakasan K, Campbell B, Hopkisson J, Johnson I, Raine-Fenning N.
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Feb; 93(3):855-64. PubMed ID: 19046583
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The clomiphene citrate challenge test versus the exogenous follicle-stimulating hormone ovarian reserve test as a single test for identification of low responders and hyperresponders to in vitro fertilization.
    Kwee J, Schats R, McDonnell J, Schoemaker J, Lambalk CB.
    Fertil Steril; 2006 Jun; 85(6):1714-22. PubMed ID: 16650416
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Single and repeated GnRH agonist stimulation tests compared with basal markers of ovarian reserve in the prediction of outcome in IVF.
    Hendriks DJ, Broekmans FJ, Bancsi LF, Looman CW, de Jong FH, te Velde ER.
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2005 Feb; 22(2):65-73. PubMed ID: 15844731
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Antral follicle count, anti-mullerian hormone and inhibin B: predictors of ovarian response in assisted reproductive technology?
    Muttukrishna S, McGarrigle H, Wakim R, Khadum I, Ranieri DM, Serhal P.
    BJOG; 2005 Oct; 112(10):1384-90. PubMed ID: 16167941
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Evaluation of the utility of multiple endocrine and ultrasound measures of ovarian reserve in the prediction of cycle cancellation in a high-risk IVF population.
    McIlveen M, Skull JD, Ledger WL.
    Hum Reprod; 2007 Mar; 22(3):778-85. PubMed ID: 17114197
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 24.