These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
344 related items for PubMed ID: 15673144
1. The mechanism of Class II correction in surgical orthodontic treatment of adult Class II, division 1 malocclusions. Pancherz H, Ruf S, Erbe C, Hansen K. Angle Orthod; 2004 Dec; 74(6):800-9. PubMed ID: 15673144 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Stability of skeletal Class II correction with 2 surgical techniques: the sagittal split ramus osteotomy and the total mandibular subapical alveolar osteotomy. Pangrazio-Kulbersh V, Berger JL, Kaczynski R, Shunock M. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Aug; 120(2):134-43. PubMed ID: 11500654 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Long-term skeletal and profile stability after surgical-orthodontic treatment of Class II and Class III malocclusion. de Lir Ade L, de Moura WL, Oliveira Ruellas AC, Gomes Souza MM, Nojima LI. J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Jun; 41(4):296-302. PubMed ID: 23196069 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Skeletal and dentoalveolar changes concurrent to use of Twin Block appliance in class II division I cases with a deficient mandible: a cephalometric study. Sharma AK, Sachdev V, Singla A, Kirtaniya BC. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012 Jun; 30(3):218-26. PubMed ID: 23263425 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Skeletal and dental changes following the use of the Frankel functional regulator. Rushforth CD, Gordon PH, Aird JC. Br J Orthod; 1999 Jun; 26(2):127-34. PubMed ID: 10420247 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Cephalometric characteristics of Class II division 1 and Class II division 2 malocclusions: a comparative study in children. Pancherz H, Zieber K, Hoyer B. Angle Orthod; 1997 Jun; 67(2):111-20. PubMed ID: 9107375 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Forsus Nitinol Flat Spring and Jasper Jumper corrections of Class II division 1 malocclusions. Karacay S, Akin E, Olmez H, Gurton AU, Sagdic D. Angle Orthod; 2006 Jul; 76(4):666-72. PubMed ID: 16808575 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of timing on the outcomes of 1-phase nonextraction therapy of Class II malocclusion. Baccetti T, Franchi L, Kim LH. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Oct; 136(4):501-9. PubMed ID: 19815151 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of the reciprocal mini-chin cup appliance. Aslan BI, Dinçer M. Eur J Orthod; 2008 Feb; 30(1):80-8. PubMed ID: 18276929 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Nonextraction treatment of a high-angle class II malocclusion: a case report. Giancotti A. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jun; 117(6):721-7. PubMed ID: 10842116 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes. Marşan G. Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Classification and treatment of Class II subdivision malocclusions. Cassidy SE, Jackson SR, Turpin DL, Ramsay DS, Spiekerman C, Huang GJ. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Apr; 145(4):443-51. PubMed ID: 24703282 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Stability and effect on the soft tissue profile of mandibular advancement with sagittal split osteotomy and rigid internal fixation. Thüer U, Ingervall B, Vuillemin T. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1994 Apr; 9(3):175-85. PubMed ID: 7814922 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]