These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

229 related items for PubMed ID: 15705365

  • 1. Antral follicle count in the prediction of poor ovarian response and pregnancy after in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis and comparison with basal follicle-stimulating hormone level.
    Hendriks DJ, Mol BW, Bancsi LF, Te Velde ER, Broekmans FJ.
    Fertil Steril; 2005 Feb; 83(2):291-301. PubMed ID: 15705365
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Ultrasonography as a tool for the prediction of outcome in IVF patients: a comparative meta-analysis of ovarian volume and antral follicle count.
    Hendriks DJ, Kwee J, Mol BW, te Velde ER, Broekmans FJ.
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Apr; 87(4):764-75. PubMed ID: 17239869
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. [Antral follicle count and oocyte quality].
    Avril C.
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2006 Sep; 35(5 Pt 2):2S42-2S43. PubMed ID: 17057623
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Circulating basal anti-Müllerian hormone levels as predictor of ovarian response in women undergoing ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization.
    Nardo LG, Gelbaya TA, Wilkinson H, Roberts SA, Yates A, Pemberton P, Laing I.
    Fertil Steril; 2009 Nov; 92(5):1586-93. PubMed ID: 18930213
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Ovarian volume and antral follicle count for the prediction of low and hyper responders with in vitro fertilization.
    Kwee J, Elting ME, Schats R, McDonnell J, Lambalk CB.
    Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2007 Mar 15; 5():9. PubMed ID: 17362511
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The role of antimullerian hormone in prediction of outcome after IVF: comparison with the antral follicle count.
    Broer SL, Mol BW, Hendriks D, Broekmans FJ.
    Fertil Steril; 2009 Mar 15; 91(3):705-14. PubMed ID: 18321493
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Prognostic value of some ovarian reserve tests in poor responders.
    Vladimirov IK, Tacheva DM, Kalinov KB, Ivanova AV, Blagoeva VD.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2005 Jun 15; 272(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 15660265
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Predictors of poor ovarian response in in vitro fertilization: a prospective study comparing basal markers of ovarian reserve.
    Bancsi LF, Broekmans FJ, Eijkemans MJ, de Jong FH, Habbema JD, te Velde ER.
    Fertil Steril; 2002 Feb 15; 77(2):328-36. PubMed ID: 11821092
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Repeated clomiphene citrate challenge testing in the prediction of outcome in IVF: a comparison with basal markers for ovarian reserve.
    Hendriks DJ, Broekmans FJ, Bancsi LF, de Jong FH, Looman CW, Te Velde ER.
    Hum Reprod; 2005 Jan 15; 20(1):163-9. PubMed ID: 15471926
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Performance of basal follicle-stimulating hormone in the prediction of poor ovarian response and failure to become pregnant after in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis.
    Bancsi LF, Broekmans FJ, Mol BW, Habbema JD, te Velde ER.
    Fertil Steril; 2003 May 15; 79(5):1091-100. PubMed ID: 12738501
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. A prospective, comparative analysis of anti-Müllerian hormone, inhibin-B, and three-dimensional ultrasound determinants of ovarian reserve in the prediction of poor response to controlled ovarian stimulation.
    Jayaprakasan K, Campbell B, Hopkisson J, Johnson I, Raine-Fenning N.
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Feb 15; 93(3):855-64. PubMed ID: 19046583
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The accuracy of multivariate models predicting ovarian reserve and pregnancy after in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis.
    Verhagen TE, Hendriks DJ, Bancsi LF, Mol BW, Broekmans FJ.
    Hum Reprod Update; 2008 Feb 15; 14(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 18292180
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Prediction of an excessive response in in vitro fertilization from patient characteristics and ovarian reserve tests and comparison in subgroups: an individual patient data meta-analysis.
    Broer SL, Dólleman M, van Disseldorp J, Broeze KA, Opmeer BC, Bossuyt PM, Eijkemans MJ, Mol BW, Broekmans FJ, IPD-EXPORT Study Group.
    Fertil Steril; 2013 Aug 15; 100(2):420-9.e7. PubMed ID: 23721718
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Antral follicle count and FSH concentration after clomiphene citrate challenge test in the prediction of ovarian response during IVF treatment.
    Ng EH, Chan CC, Tang OS, Ho PC.
    Hum Reprod; 2005 Jun 15; 20(6):1647-54. PubMed ID: 15734749
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Combining cycle day 7 follicle count with the basal antral follicle count improves the prediction of ovarian response.
    Durmusoglu F, Elter K, Yoruk P, Erenus M.
    Fertil Steril; 2004 Apr 15; 81(4):1073-8. PubMed ID: 15066466
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Do ovarian reserve tests predict miscarriage in women undergoing assisted reproduction treatment?
    Sahu B, Oztutrk O, Serhal P, Jayaprakasan K.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 Dec 15; 153(2):181-4. PubMed ID: 20884109
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Prediction of ovarian reserve, poor response and pregnancy outcome based on basal antral follicle count and age in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer].
    Chen SL, Xia R, Chen X, Luo YQ, Wang LL, Wu YQ, Shi XY, Zheng HY.
    Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2011 Apr 15; 31(4):572-7. PubMed ID: 21515446
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Evaluation of anti-Müllerian hormone as a test for the prediction of ovarian reserve.
    Kwee J, Schats R, McDonnell J, Themmen A, de Jong F, Lambalk C.
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Sep 15; 90(3):737-43. PubMed ID: 17923131
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Prediction of in vitro fertilization outcome at different antral follicle count thresholds in a prospective cohort of 1,012 women.
    Jayaprakasan K, Chan Y, Islam R, Haoula Z, Hopkisson J, Coomarasamy A, Raine-Fenning N.
    Fertil Steril; 2012 Sep 15; 98(3):657-63. PubMed ID: 22749225
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Anti-Müllerian hormone versus antral follicle count for defining the starting dose of FSH.
    Lan VT, Linh NK, Tuong HM, Wong PC, Howles CM.
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2013 Oct 15; 27(4):390-9. PubMed ID: 23953069
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.