These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. The effect of alternative prey on the dynamics of imperfect Batesian and Müllerian mimicries. Lindström L, Alatalo RV, Lyytinen A, Mappes J. Evolution; 2004 Jun; 58(6):1294-302. PubMed ID: 15266978 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Frequency-dependent taste-rejection by avian predation may select for defence chemical polymorphisms in aposematic prey. Skelhorn J, Rowe C. Biol Lett; 2005 Dec 22; 1(4):500-3. PubMed ID: 17148243 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Heterogeneity in predator micro-habitat use and the maintenance of Müllerian mimetic diversity. Gompert Z, Willmott K, Elias M. J Theor Biol; 2011 Jul 21; 281(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 21549131 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Investigating Müllerian mimicry: predator learning and variation in prey defences. Ihalainen E, Lindström L, Mappes J. J Evol Biol; 2007 Mar 21; 20(2):780-91. PubMed ID: 17305843 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The evolution of Müllerian mimicry. Sherratt TN. Naturwissenschaften; 2008 Aug 21; 95(8):681-95. PubMed ID: 18542902 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Automimicry destabilizes aposematism: predator sample-and-reject behaviour may provide a solution. Gamberale-Stille G, Guilford T. Proc Biol Sci; 2004 Dec 22; 271(1557):2621-5. PubMed ID: 15615689 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The evolution of müllerian mimicry in multispecies communities. Beatty CD, Beirinckx K, Sherratt TN. Nature; 2004 Sep 02; 431(7004):63-6. PubMed ID: 15343332 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Natural selection on unpalatable species imposed by state-dependent foraging behaviour. Sherratt TN, Speed MP, Ruxton GD. J Theor Biol; 2004 May 21; 228(2):217-26. PubMed ID: 15094016 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Evasive mimicry: when (if ever) could mimicry based on difficulty of capture evolve? Ruxton GD, Speed M, Sherratt TN. Proc Biol Sci; 2004 Oct 22; 271(1553):2135-42. PubMed ID: 15475333 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Spatial mosaic formation through frequency-dependent selection in Müllerian mimicry complexes. Sherratt TN. J Theor Biol; 2006 May 21; 240(2):165-74. PubMed ID: 16271369 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Both Palatable and Unpalatable Butterflies Use Bright Colors to Signal Difficulty of Capture to Predators. Pinheiro CE, Freitas AV, Campos VC, DeVries PJ, Penz CM. Neotrop Entomol; 2016 Apr 07; 45(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 26911159 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Variation in cyanogenic compounds concentration within a Heliconius butterfly community: does mimicry explain everything? Arias M, Meichanetzoglou A, Elias M, Rosser N, de-Silva DL, Nay B, Llaurens V. BMC Evol Biol; 2016 Dec 15; 16(1):272. PubMed ID: 27978820 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]