These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Comparison of primary angioplasty and pre-hospital fibrinolysis in acute myocardial infarction (CAPTIM) trial: a 5-year follow-up. Bonnefoy E, Steg PG, Boutitie F, Dubien PY, Lapostolle F, Roncalli J, Dissait F, Vanzetto G, Leizorowicz A, Kirkorian G, CAPTIM Investigators, Mercier C, McFadden EP, Touboul P. Eur Heart J; 2009 Jul; 30(13):1598-606. PubMed ID: 19429632 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost and health outcome of primary percutaneous coronary intervention versus thrombolysis in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction-Results of the Swedish Early Decision reperfusion Study (SWEDES) trial. Aasa M, Henriksson M, Dellborg M, Grip L, Herlitz J, Levin LA, Svensson L, Janzon M. Am Heart J; 2010 Aug; 160(2):322-8. PubMed ID: 20691839 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. In-hospital and one-year outcomes of patients with high-risk acute myocardial infarction treated with thrombolysis or primary coronary angioplasty. Steffenino G, Santoro GM, Maras P, Mauri F, Ardissino D, Violini R, Chiarella F, Lucci D, Marini M, Baldasseroni S, Maggioni AP, Myocardial Infarction with Severe prognosis: observation of Treatment with Angioplasty or Lysis Study Investigators. Ital Heart J; 2004 Feb; 5(2):136-45. PubMed ID: 15086144 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Is transport with platelet GP IIb/IIIa inhibition for primary percutaneous coronary intervention more efficient than on-site thrombolysis in patients with STEMI admitted to community hospitals? Randomised study. Early results. Dobrzycki S, Mezyński G, Kralisz P, Prokopczuk P, Nowak K, Kochman W, Zuk J, Bachórzewska-Gajewska H, Sawicki Z, Poniatowski B, Korecki J, Musiał WJ. Kardiol Pol; 2006 Aug; 64(8):793-9; discussion 800-1. PubMed ID: 16981054 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Multicentre randomized trial comparing transport to primary angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis vs combined strategy for patients with acute myocardial infarction presenting to a community hospital without a catheterization laboratory. The PRAGUE study. Widimský P, Groch L, Zelízko M, Aschermann M, Bednár F, Suryapranata H. Eur Heart J; 2000 May; 21(10):823-31. PubMed ID: 10781354 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Treatment of acute myocardial infarction in Switzerland: is emergency PTCA more costly than thrombolysis?]. Hagmann A, Amann W, Urban P, Pfisterer M. Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1999 Oct 02; 129(39):1389-96. PubMed ID: 10542996 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of thrombolytic therapy with primary coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Investigators. Every NR, Parsons LS, Hlatky M, Martin JS, Weaver WD. N Engl J Med; 1996 Oct 24; 335(17):1253-60. PubMed ID: 8857004 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Pre-hospital thrombolysis delivered by paramedics is associated with reduced time delay and mortality in ambulance-transported real-life patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Björklund E, Stenestrand U, Lindbäck J, Svensson L, Wallentin L, Lindahl B. Eur Heart J; 2006 May 24; 27(10):1146-52. PubMed ID: 16624832 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]