These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

277 related items for PubMed ID: 15711776

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Development and validation of the osteoporosis prescreening risk assessment (OPERA) tool to facilitate identification of women likely to have low bone density.
    Salaffi F, Silveri F, Stancati A, Grassi W.
    Clin Rheumatol; 2005 Jun; 24(3):203-11. PubMed ID: 15549501
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [Optimal cut-off value of phalangeal radiographic absorptiometry to identify osteoporosis in postmenopausal women].
    Liu T, Lu CY, Guo YH, Wang Q, Chen DC.
    Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2014 May; 45(3):506-8, 528. PubMed ID: 24941829
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Discriminatory Performance of the Calcaneal Quantitative Ultrasound and Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool to Select Older Women for Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry.
    McLeod KM, Johnson S, Rasali D, Verma A.
    J Clin Densitom; 2015 May; 18(2):157-64. PubMed ID: 25937306
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Device-specific thresholds to diagnose osteoporosis at the proximal femur: an approach to interpreting peripheral bone measurements in clinical practice.
    Clowes JA, Peel NF, Eastell R.
    Osteoporos Int; 2006 May; 17(9):1293-302. PubMed ID: 16810454
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. How well do radiographic absorptiometry and quantitative ultrasound predict osteoporosis at spine or hip? A cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Lippuner K, Fuchs G, Ruetsche AG, Perrelet R, Casez JP, Neto I.
    J Clin Densitom; 2000 May; 3(3):241-9. PubMed ID: 11090231
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Point-of-Care Phalangeal Bone Mineral Density Measurement Can Reduce the Need of Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Scanning in Danish Women at Risk of Fracture.
    Holmberg T, Bech M, Gram J, Hermann AP, Rubin KH, Brixen K.
    Calcif Tissue Int; 2016 Mar; 98(3):244-52. PubMed ID: 26590810
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Assessment of osteoporosis: comparison of radiographic absorptiometry of the phalanges and dual X-ray absorptiometry of the radius and lumbar spine.
    Takada M, Engelke K, Hagiwara S, Grampp S, Jergas M, Glüer CC, Genant HK.
    Radiology; 1997 Mar; 202(3):759-63. PubMed ID: 9051031
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Targeted assessment of fracture risk in women at midlife.
    Davis SR, Tan A, Bell RJ.
    Osteoporos Int; 2015 Jun; 26(6):1705-12. PubMed ID: 25630574
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Prospective evaluation of risk of vertebral fractures using quantitative ultrasound measurements and bone mineral density in a population-based sample of postmenopausal women: results of the Basel Osteoporosis Study.
    Hollaender R, Hartl F, Krieg MA, Tyndall A, Geuckel C, Buitrago-Tellez C, Manghani M, Kraenzlin M, Theiler R, Hans D.
    Ann Rheum Dis; 2009 Mar; 68(3):391-6. PubMed ID: 18417517
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Simplifying screening for osteoporosis in Australian primary care: the Prospective Screening for Osteoporosis; Australian Primary Care Evaluation of Clinical Tests (PROSPECT) study.
    Davis SR, Kirby C, Weekes A, Lanzafame A, Piterman L.
    Menopause; 2011 Jan; 18(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 20711081
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Detection of osteoporosis by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the calcaneus: is the WHO criterion applicable?
    Pacheco EM, Harrison EJ, Ward KA, Lunt M, Adams JE.
    Calcif Tissue Int; 2002 Jun; 70(6):475-82. PubMed ID: 11960208
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A comparative study of computed digital absorptiometry and conventional dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in postmenopausal women.
    Fiter J, Nolla JM, Gómez-Vaquero C, Martínez-Aguilá D, Valverde J, Roig-Escofet D.
    Osteoporos Int; 2001 Jun; 12(7):565-9. PubMed ID: 11527054
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Prevalence of osteoporosis and related risk factors in UK women in the seventh decade: osteoporosis case finding by clinical referral criteria or predictive model?
    Ballard PA, Purdie DW, Langton CM, Steel SA, Mussurakis S.
    Osteoporos Int; 1998 Jun; 8(6):535-9. PubMed ID: 10326057
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.