These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

384 related items for PubMed ID: 15712421

  • 1. The CCAR responsum on end of life issues: an American legal perspective.
    Saperstein D, Mishkin D.
    CCAR J; 1997; 44(2):36-45. PubMed ID: 15712421
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. But, why do we shoot horses?: an analysis of the right to die and euthanasia.
    Davidson SI.
    N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1994; 12(1):115-61. PubMed ID: 16086499
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Responsible public policy at the end of life.
    Chopko ME.
    Univ Detroit Mercy Law Rev; 1998; 75(3):557-94. PubMed ID: 12627572
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The court upholds a state law prohibiting physician-assisted suicide.
    Feinberg B.
    J Crim Law Criminol; 1998; 88(3):847-76. PubMed ID: 12455522
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. "Suicide: a constitutional right?"-- reflections eleven years later.
    Marzen TJ, O'Dowd MK, Crone D, Balch TJ.
    Duquesne Law Rev; 1996; 35(1):261-84. PubMed ID: 12385309
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Who decides if there is "triumph in the ultimate agony?" Constitutional theory and the emerging right to die with dignity.
    Goebel BC.
    William Mary Law Rev; 1996; 37(2):827-901. PubMed ID: 12173637
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The right to die with dignity with the assistance of a physician: an Anglo, American and Australian international perspective.
    Woods E.
    ILSA J Int Law; 1998; 4(2):817-34. PubMed ID: 12236256
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Whose life is it anyway?: an analysis and commentary on the emerging law of physician-assisted suicide.
    Gaumer CP, Griffith PR.
    S D Law Rev; 1997; 42(3):357-98. PubMed ID: 16086516
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Is the Constitution a suicide pact?
    Avila D.
    Duquesne Law Rev; 1996; 35(1):201-59. PubMed ID: 12385308
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The last best place to die: physician-assisted suicide and Montana's constitutional right to personal autonomy privacy.
    Fisk SA.
    Mont Law Rev; 1998; 59(2):301-41. PubMed ID: 14631926
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Physician-assisted suicide: a common law roadmap for state courts.
    Meisel A.
    Fordham Urban Law J; 1997; 24(4):817-57. PubMed ID: 12455513
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Is the right to die dead?
    Samar VJ.
    De Paul Law Rev; 2000; 50(1):221-64. PubMed ID: 12455502
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The "right to die": on drawing (and erasing) lines.
    Kamisar Y.
    Duquesne Law Rev; 1996; 35(1):481-521. PubMed ID: 12385319
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Paradox and Pandora's box: the tragedy of current right-to-die jurisprudence.
    Roach CA.
    Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1991; 25(1):133-90. PubMed ID: 16145810
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The right to assisted suicide and euthanasia.
    Gorsuch NM.
    Harv J Law Public Policy; 2000; 23(2):599-710. PubMed ID: 12524693
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Confusion in right to die ideology: impact of ethical decision making for treatment of an incompetent client.
    Harner SR.
    Georget J Leg Ethics; 1991; 4(4):869-98. PubMed ID: 12186076
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 20.