These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


136 related items for PubMed ID: 15712587

  • 1. Induced current density in the foetus of pregnant workers in high magnetic field environments.
    Xue C, Wood AW, Dovan T.
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2004 Dec; 27(4):199-206. PubMed ID: 15712587
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Analysis and measurements of magnetic field exposures for healthcare workers in selected MR environments.
    Fuentes MA, Trakic A, Wilson SJ, Crozier S.
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Apr; 55(4):1355-64. PubMed ID: 18390326
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Is it safe to work with iodine-131 if you are pregnant? A risk assessment for nuclear medicine staff involved with cleaning and decontamination.
    Barber RW, Parkin A, Goldstone KE.
    Nucl Med Commun; 2003 May; 24(5):571-4. PubMed ID: 12717076
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Calculation of magnetic field-induced current densities for humans from EAS countertop activation/deactivation devices that use ferromagnetic cores.
    Li Q, Gandhi OP.
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jan 21; 50(2):373-85. PubMed ID: 15742951
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. COMPUTATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF PREGNANT WOMAN MODELS EXPOSED TO UNIFORM ELF-MAGNETIC FIELDS: COMPLIANCE WITH THE EUROPEAN CURRENT EXPOSURE REGULATIONS FOR THE GENERAL PUBLIC AND OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES AT 50 Hz.
    Liorni I, Parazzini M, Fiocchi S, Douglas M, Capstick M, Kuster N, Ravazzani P.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Dec 21; 172(4):382-392. PubMed ID: 26628611
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Neutron fluence-to-dose conversion coefficients for embryo and fetus.
    Chen J, Meyerhof D, Vlahovich S.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004 Dec 21; 110(1-4):693-8. PubMed ID: 15353732
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. FDTD simulation of exposure of biological material to electromagnetic nanopulses.
    Simicevic N, Haynie DT.
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jan 21; 50(2):347-60. PubMed ID: 15742949
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. SAR in the mother and foetus for RF plane wave irradiation.
    Dimbylow P.
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul 07; 52(13):3791-802. PubMed ID: 17664577
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.