These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

211 related items for PubMed ID: 15719153

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Palangeal quantitative ultrasound, phalangeal morphometric variables, and vertebral fracture discrimination.
    Guglielmi G, Njeh CF, de Terlizzi F, De Serio DA, Scillitani A, Cammisa M, Fan B, Lu Y, Genant HK.
    Calcif Tissue Int; 2003 Apr; 72(4):469-77. PubMed ID: 12574870
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Performance of five phalangeal QUS parameters in the evaluation of gonadal-status, age and vertebral fracture risk compared with DXA.
    Albanese CV, Cepollaro C, de Terlizzi F, Brandi ML, Passariello R.
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2009 Apr; 35(4):537-44. PubMed ID: 19097682
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Ultrasound measurements at the proximal phalanges in healthy women and patients with hip fractures.
    Alenfeld FE, Wüster C, Funck C, Pereira-Lima JF, Fritz T, Meeder PJ, Ziegler R.
    Osteoporos Int; 1998 Apr; 8(5):393-8. PubMed ID: 9850344
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Quantitative ultrasound at the phalanxes discriminates osteoporotic women with vertebral but not with hip fracture.
    Gnudi S, Ripamonti C.
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2004 Mar; 30(3):357-61. PubMed ID: 15063517
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Can radial bone mineral density and quantitative ultrasound measurements reduce the number of women who need axial density skeletal assessment?
    Damilakis J, Papadokostakis G, Perisinakis K, Hadjipavlou A, Gourtsoyiannis N.
    Osteoporos Int; 2003 Aug; 14(8):688-93. PubMed ID: 12897977
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Contact quantitative ultrasound: an evaluation of precision, fracture discrimination, age-related bone loss and applicability of the WHO criteria.
    Frost ML, Blake GM, Fogelman I.
    Osteoporos Int; 1999 Aug; 10(6):441-9. PubMed ID: 10663343
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Does quantitative ultrasound imaging enhance precision and discrimination?
    Frost ML, Blake GM, Fogelman I.
    Osteoporos Int; 2000 Aug; 11(5):425-33. PubMed ID: 10912845
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Assessment of a new quantitative ultrasound calcaneus measurement: precision and discrimination of hip fractures in elderly women compared with dual X-ray absorptiometry.
    He YQ, Fan B, Hans D, Li J, Wu CY, Njeh CF, Zhao S, Lu Y, Tsuda-Futami E, Fuerst T, Genant HK.
    Osteoporos Int; 2000 Aug; 11(4):354-60. PubMed ID: 10928226
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Quantitative ultrasound and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the prediction of fragility fracture in men.
    Gonnelli S, Cepollaro C, Gennari L, Montagnani A, Caffarelli C, Merlotti D, Rossi S, Cadirni A, Nuti R.
    Osteoporos Int; 2005 Aug; 16(8):963-8. PubMed ID: 15599495
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Discrimination of hip fractures by quantitative ultrasound of the phalanges and the calcaneus and dual X-ray absorptiometry.
    Damilakis J, Papadokostakis G, Perisinakis K, Maris T, Dimitriou P, Hadjipavlou A, Gourtsoyiannis N.
    Eur J Radiol; 2004 Jun; 50(3):268-72. PubMed ID: 15145486
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Calcaneus ultrasonometry and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for the evaluation of vertebral fracture risk.
    Frediani B, Acciai C, Falsetti P, Baldi F, Filippou G, Siagkri C, Spreafico A, Galeazzi M, Marcolongo R.
    Calcif Tissue Int; 2006 Oct; 79(4):223-9. PubMed ID: 16969597
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Does the combination of quantitative ultrasound and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry improve fracture discrimination?
    Frost ML, Blake GM, Fogelman I.
    Osteoporos Int; 2001 Oct; 12(6):471-7. PubMed ID: 11446563
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparisons of noninvasive bone mineral measurements in assessing age-related loss, fracture discrimination, and diagnostic classification.
    Grampp S, Genant HK, Mathur A, Lang P, Jergas M, Takada M, Glüer CC, Lu Y, Chavez M.
    J Bone Miner Res; 1997 May; 12(5):697-711. PubMed ID: 9144335
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Quantitative ultrasound of the tibia depends on both cortical density and thickness.
    Prevrhal S, Fuerst T, Fan B, Njeh C, Hans D, Uffmann M, Srivastav S, Genant HK.
    Osteoporos Int; 2001 May; 12(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 11305080
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Quantitative bone ultrasound at phalanges and calcaneus in osteoporotic postmenopausal women: influence of age and measurement site.
    Camozzi V, De Terlizzi F, Zangari M, Luisetto G.
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 33(7):1039-45. PubMed ID: 17445968
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Quantitative ultrasound of the phalanges and DXA of the lumbar spine and proximal femur in evaluating the risk of osteoporotic vertebral fracture in postmenopausal women.
    Albanese CV, De Terlizzi F, Passariello R.
    Radiol Med; 2011 Feb; 116(1):92-101. PubMed ID: 20927655
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. A comparison of fracture discrimination using calcaneal quantitative ultrasound and dual X-ray absorptiometry in women with a history of fracture at sites other than the spine and hip.
    Frost ML, Blake GM, Fogelman I.
    Calcif Tissue Int; 2002 Sep; 71(3):207-11. PubMed ID: 12154392
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Ultrasound velocity through the cortex of phalanges, radius, and tibia in normal and osteoporotic postmenopausal women using a new multisite quantitative ultrasound device.
    Damilakis J, Papadokostakis G, Vrahoriti H, Tsagaraki I, Perisinakis K, Hadjipavlou A, Gourtsoyiannis N.
    Invest Radiol; 2003 Apr; 38(4):207-11. PubMed ID: 12649644
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.