These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
1201 related items for PubMed ID: 15724011
1. Limitations of dermoscopy in the recognition of melanoma. Skvara H, Teban L, Fiebiger M, Binder M, Kittler H. Arch Dermatol; 2005 Feb; 141(2):155-60. PubMed ID: 15724011 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The significance of eccentric and central hyperpigmentation, multifocal hyper/hypopigmentation, and the multicomponent pattern in melanocytic lesions lacking specific dermoscopic features of melanoma. Arevalo A, Altamura D, Avramidis M, Blum A, Menzies S. Arch Dermatol; 2008 Nov; 144(11):1440-4. PubMed ID: 19015418 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Dermoscopy patterns of halo nevi. Kolm I, Di Stefani A, Hofmann-Wellenhof R, Fink-Puches R, Wolf IH, Richtig E, Smolle J, Kerl H, Soyer HP, Zalaudek I. Arch Dermatol; 2006 Dec; 142(12):1627-32. PubMed ID: 17178990 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of three dermoscopic algorithmic methods in the diagnosis of doubtful melanocytic lesions: the importance of light brown structureless areas in differentiating atypical melanocytic nevi from thin melanomas. Annessi G, Bono R, Sampogna F, Faraggiana T, Abeni D. J Am Acad Dermatol; 2007 May; 56(5):759-67. PubMed ID: 17316894 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Identification of clinically featureless incipient melanoma using sequential dermoscopy imaging. Kittler H, Guitera P, Riedl E, Avramidis M, Teban L, Fiebiger M, Weger RA, Dawid M, Menzies S. Arch Dermatol; 2006 Sep; 142(9):1113-9. PubMed ID: 16982998 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Surveillance of patients at high risk for cutaneous malignant melanoma using digital dermoscopy. Bauer J, Blum A, Strohhäcker U, Garbe C. Br J Dermatol; 2005 Jan; 152(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 15656806 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Dermoscopic monitoring of melanocytic skin lesions: clinical outcome and patient compliance vary according to follow-up protocols. Argenziano G, Mordente I, Ferrara G, Sgambato A, Annese P, Zalaudek I. Br J Dermatol; 2008 Aug; 159(2):331-6. PubMed ID: 18510663 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Microscopic in vivo description of cellular architecture of dermoscopic pigment network in nevi and melanomas. Pellacani G, Cesinaro AM, Longo C, Grana C, Seidenari S. Arch Dermatol; 2005 Feb; 141(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 15724010 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical selection of melanocytic lesions for dermoscopy decreases the identification of suspicious lesions in comparison with dermoscopy without clinical preselection. Seidenari S, Longo C, Giusti F, Pellacani G. Br J Dermatol; 2006 May; 154(5):873-9. PubMed ID: 16634889 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Melanoma arising in segmental nevus spilus: detection by sequential digital dermatoscopy. Haenssle HA, Kaune KM, Buhl T, Thoms KM, Padeken M, Emmert S, Schön MP. J Am Acad Dermatol; 2009 Aug; 61(2):337-41. PubMed ID: 19233509 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Dermoscopic patterns of acral melanocytic nevi and melanomas in a white population in central Italy. Altamura D, Altobelli E, Micantonio T, Piccolo D, Fargnoli MC, Peris K. Arch Dermatol; 2006 Sep; 142(9):1123-8. PubMed ID: 16982999 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Melanomas difficult to diagnose via dermoscopy. Rose SE, Argenziano G, Marghoob AA. G Ital Dermatol Venereol; 2010 Feb; 145(1):111-26. PubMed ID: 20197750 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Incidence of new and changed nevi and melanomas detected using baseline images and dermoscopy in patients at high risk for melanoma. Banky JP, Kelly JW, English DR, Yeatman JM, Dowling JP. Arch Dermatol; 2005 Aug; 141(8):998-1006. PubMed ID: 16103329 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Digital image analysis for diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma. Development of a highly effective computer algorithm based on analysis of 837 melanocytic lesions. Blum A, Luedtke H, Ellwanger U, Schwabe R, Rassner G, Garbe C. Br J Dermatol; 2004 Nov; 151(5):1029-38. PubMed ID: 15541081 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Dermoscopic changes in acral melanocytic nevi during digital follow-up. Altamura D, Zalaudek I, Sera F, Argenziano G, Fargnoli MC, Rossiello L, Peris K. Arch Dermatol; 2007 Nov; 143(11):1372-6. PubMed ID: 18025360 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Correlation of dermoscopic structures of melanocytic lesions to reflectance confocal microscopy. Scope A, Benvenuto-Andrade C, Agero AL, Halpern AC, Gonzalez S, Marghoob AA. Arch Dermatol; 2007 Feb; 143(2):176-85. PubMed ID: 17309998 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Significance of dermoscopic patterns in detecting malignant melanoma on acral volar skin: results of a multicenter study in Japan. Saida T, Miyazaki A, Oguchi S, Ishihara Y, Yamazaki Y, Murase S, Yoshikawa S, Tsuchida T, Kawabata Y, Tamaki K. Arch Dermatol; 2004 Oct; 140(10):1233-8. PubMed ID: 15492186 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Follow-up of melanocytic skin lesions with digital epiluminescence microscopy: patterns of modifications observed in early melanoma, atypical nevi, and common nevi. Kittler H, Pehamberger H, Wolff K, Binder M. J Am Acad Dermatol; 2000 Sep; 43(3):467-76. PubMed ID: 10954658 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Epidermolysis bullosa nevus: an exception to the clinical and dermoscopic criteria for melanoma. Cash SH, Dever TT, Hyde P, Lee JB. Arch Dermatol; 2007 Sep; 143(9):1164-7. PubMed ID: 17875878 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Correlation with digital dermoscopic images can help dermatopathologists to diagnose equivocal skin tumours. Bauer J, Leinweber B, Metzler G, Blum A, Hofmann-Wellenhof R, Leitz N, Dietz K, Soyer HP, Garbe C. Br J Dermatol; 2006 Sep; 155(3):546-51. PubMed ID: 16911279 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]