These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

533 related items for PubMed ID: 15739274

  • 1. Title X, the abortion debate, and the First Amendment.
    Shapiro AA.
    Columbia Law Rev; 1990 Oct; 90(6):1737-78. PubMed ID: 15739274
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The pregnant silence: Rust v. Sullivan, abortion rights, and publicly funded speech.
    Weeks AB.
    North Carol Law Rev; 1992 Jun; 70(5):1623-68. PubMed ID: 16044600
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Why the unconstitutional conditions doctrine is an anachronism (with particular reference to religion, speech, and abortion).
    Sunstein CR.
    Boston Univ Law Rev; 1990 Jul; 70(4):593-621. PubMed ID: 15739275
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Toward a First Amendment theory of doctor-patient discourse and the right to receive unbiased medical advice.
    Berg P.
    Boston Univ Law Rev; 1994 Mar; 74(2):201-66. PubMed ID: 11659979
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The Title X family planning gag rule: can the government buy up constitutional rights?
    Chervin CI.
    Stanford Law Rev; 1989 Jan; 41(2):401-34. PubMed ID: 11655926
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Latest administration tactic makes abortion fight a free speech issue.
    Lewin T.
    N Y Times Web; 1988 Feb 07; ():E7. PubMed ID: 11647385
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Refusal clause seen as threat to reproductive health, gag on information.
    Krisberg K.
    Nations Health; 2005 Feb 07; 35(1):1, 10. PubMed ID: 15810206
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Why the government is not required to subsidize abortion counseling and referral.
    Hirt TC.
    Harv Law Rev; 1988 Jun 07; 101():1895-915. PubMed ID: 11655923
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. New York v. Sullivan.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
    Fed Report; 1989 Nov 01; 889():401-18. PubMed ID: 11648392
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Abortion 'gag' rule.
    Notkin H.
    West J Med; 1991 Aug 01; 155(2):191. PubMed ID: 1926860
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 27.