These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

159 related items for PubMed ID: 15748187

  • 1. Evidence for correlation of objective and subjective measures of nasal airflow in patients with common cold.
    Clarke JD, Hopkins ML, Eccles R.
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2005 Feb; 30(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 15748187
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Efficacy and safety of single and multiple doses of pseudoephedrine in the treatment of nasal congestion associated with common cold.
    Eccles R, Jawad MS, Jawad SS, Angello JT, Druce HM.
    Am J Rhinol; 2005 Feb; 19(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 15794071
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Paradoxical sensation of nasal airflow in patients with common cold. Are we measuring the correct modality?
    Clarke JD, Eccles R.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Dec; 125(12):1307-11. PubMed ID: 16303679
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Assessment of subjective scales for selection of patients for nasal septal surgery.
    Boyce JM, Eccles R.
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2006 Aug; 31(4):297-302. PubMed ID: 16911648
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Clinical assessment of a nasal decongestion test by visual analog scale in allergic rhinitis.
    Ciprandi G, Klersy C, Ameli F, Cirillo I.
    Am J Rhinol; 2008 Aug; 22(5):502-5. PubMed ID: 18954509
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Assessment of nasal obstruction: correlation between subjective and objective techniques.
    Yepes-Nuñez JJ, Bartra J, Muñoz-Cano R, Sánchez-López J, Serrano C, Mullol J, Alobid I, Sastre J, Picado C, Valero A.
    Allergol Immunopathol (Madr); 2013 Aug; 41(6):397-401. PubMed ID: 23140913
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Efficacy of inferior turbinate coblation for treatment of nasal obstruction.
    Farmer SE, Quine SM, Eccles R.
    J Laryngol Otol; 2009 Mar; 123(3):309-14. PubMed ID: 18538041
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Nasal airway volume and resistance to airflow.
    Zhang G, Solomon P, Rival R, Fenton RS, Cole P.
    Am J Rhinol; 2008 Mar; 22(4):371-5. PubMed ID: 18702900
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Coblation® inferior turbinate reduction: a long-term follow-up with subjective and objective assessment.
    Leong SC, Farmer SE, Eccles R.
    Rhinology; 2010 Mar; 48(1):108-12. PubMed ID: 20502745
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Clinical assessment of nasal decongestion test by VAS in adolescents.
    Marseglia GL, Cirillo I, Klersy C, Caimmi D, Caimmi S, Castellazzi AM, Ciprandi G.
    Pediatr Allergy Immunol; 2009 Mar; 20(2):187-91. PubMed ID: 18422891
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Relationship between severity of rhinitis symptoms and nasal airflow.
    Ciprandi G, Cirillo I, Pistorio A.
    Rhinology; 2008 Sep; 46(3):209-12. PubMed ID: 18853873
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Nasal airflow and olfactory function after the repair of cleft palate (with and without cleft lip).
    Grossmann N, Brin I, Aizenbud D, Sichel JY, Gross-Isseroff R, Steiner J.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Nov; 100(5):539-44. PubMed ID: 16243237
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of optical rhinometry and active anterior rhinomanometry using nasal provocation testing.
    Wüstenberg EG, Zahnert T, Hüttenbrink KB, Hummel T.
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2007 Apr; 133(4):344-9. PubMed ID: 17438248
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Rhinomanometry Versus Computational Fluid Dynamics: Correlated, but Different Techniques.
    Cherobin GB, Voegels RL, Pinna FR, Gebrim EMMS, Bailey RS, Garcia GJM.
    Am J Rhinol Allergy; 2021 Mar; 35(2):245-255. PubMed ID: 32806938
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.