These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
194 related items for PubMed ID: 15770039
1. Trends in recall, biopsy, and positive biopsy rates for screening mammography in an academic practice. Gur D, Wallace LP, Klym AH, Hardesty LA, Abrams GS, Shah R, Sumkin JH. Radiology; 2005 May; 235(2):396-401. PubMed ID: 15770039 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Regarding trends in recall, biopsy, and positive biopsy rates for screening mammography. Ellis RL. Radiology; 2006 Jan; 238(1):375-6; author reply 376. PubMed ID: 16373783 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A decade of breast cancer screening in The Netherlands: trends in the preoperative diagnosis of breast cancer. Duijm LE, Groenewoud JH, Roumen RM, de Koning HJ, Plaisier ML, Fracheboud J. Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Nov; 106(1):113-9. PubMed ID: 17219049 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of screening mammography in the United States and the United kingdom. Smith-Bindman R, Chu PW, Miglioretti DL, Sickles EA, Blanks R, Ballard-Barbash R, Bobo JK, Lee NC, Wallis MG, Patnick J, Kerlikowske K. JAMA; 2003 Oct 22; 290(16):2129-37. PubMed ID: 14570948 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Screening mammograms: interpretation with computer-aided detection--prospective evaluation. Morton MJ, Whaley DH, Brandt KR, Amrami KK. Radiology; 2006 May 22; 239(2):375-83. PubMed ID: 16569779 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of benign breast biopsy on subsequent breast cancer detection practices. Benedict S, Williams RD, Baron PL. Oncol Nurs Forum; 1994 Oct 22; 21(9):1467-75. PubMed ID: 7816674 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Changes in recall type and patient treatment following implementation of screening digital breast tomosynthesis. Lourenco AP, Barry-Brooks M, Baird GL, Tuttle A, Mainiero MB. Radiology; 2015 Feb 22; 274(2):337-42. PubMed ID: 25247407 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Breast cancer detection with short-interval follow-up compared with return to annual screening in patients with benign stereotactic or US-guided breast biopsy results. Johnson JM, Johnson AK, O'Meara ES, Miglioretti DL, Geller BM, Hotaling EN, Herschorn SD. Radiology; 2015 Apr 22; 275(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 25423143 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Recall and detection rates in screening mammography. Gur D, Sumkin JH, Hardesty LA, Clearfield RJ, Cohen CS, Ganott MA, Hakim CM, Harris KM, Poller WR, Shah R, Wallace LP, Rockette HE. Cancer; 2004 Apr 15; 100(8):1590-4. PubMed ID: 15073844 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Time trends of process and impact indicators in Italian breast screening programmes: 1998-2007. Giordano L, Giorgi D, Piccini P, Ventura L, Stefanini V, Senore C, Castagno R, Paci E, Segnan N. Epidemiol Prev; 2009 Apr 15; 33(3 Suppl 2):29-39. PubMed ID: 19776485 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after the introduction of a computer-aided detection system. Gur D, Sumkin JH, Rockette HE, Ganott M, Hakim C, Hardesty L, Poller WR, Shah R, Wallace L. J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Feb 04; 96(3):185-90. PubMed ID: 14759985 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]