These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


87 related items for PubMed ID: 15784936

  • 1. Mandibular incisal edge demineralization and caries associated with Twin Block appliance design.
    Dixon M, Jones Y, Mackie IE, Derwent SK.
    J Orthod; 2005 Mar; 32(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 15784936
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A case of severe caries and demineralisation in a patient wearing an essix-type retainer.
    Birdsall J, Robinson S.
    Prim Dent Care; 2008 Apr; 15(2):59-61. PubMed ID: 18397593
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Soft drinks: hard on teeth.
    Erickson PR, Alevizos DL, Rindelaub DJ.
    Northwest Dent; 2001 Apr; 80(2):15-9. PubMed ID: 11411406
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Demineralization demons.
    Damle SG.
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2003 Jun; 21(2):v. PubMed ID: 14700334
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Skeletal and dentoalveolar changes concurrent to use of Twin Block appliance in class II division I cases with a deficient mandible: a cephalometric study.
    Sharma AK, Sachdev V, Singla A, Kirtaniya BC.
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012 Jun; 30(3):218-26. PubMed ID: 23263425
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Elastomeric-ligated vs self-ligating appliances: a pilot study examining microbial colonization and white spot lesion formation after 1 year of orthodontic treatment.
    Buck T, Pellegrini P, Sauerwein R, Leo MC, Covell DA, Maier T, Machida CA.
    Orthodontics (Chic.); 2011 Jun; 12(2):108-21. PubMed ID: 21935504
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Herbst Appliance fixed-functional appliance Class II skeletal malocclusion.
    Rondeau B.
    J Gen Orthod; 2001 Jun; 12(3):7-17. PubMed ID: 11692451
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Treatment effects of the R-appliance and twin block in Class II division 1 malocclusion.
    Jamilian A, Showkatbakhsh R, Amiri SS.
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Aug; 33(4):354-8. PubMed ID: 20956385
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Time to do it right: soda pop decay is a preventable disease.
    Laganis V.
    Northwest Dent; 2001 Aug; 80(2):13. PubMed ID: 11411405
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A comparison of the skeletal, dental, and soft tissue effects caused by herbst and mandibular protraction appliances in the treatment of mandibular Class II malocclusions.
    Alves PF, Oliveira AG.
    World J Orthod; 2008 Aug; 9(1):e1-19. PubMed ID: 19641760
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparison of Twin-block and Dynamax appliances for the treatment of Class II malocclusion in adolescents: a randomized controlled trial.
    Thiruvenkatachari B, Sandler J, Murray A, Walsh T, O'Brien K.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Aug; 138(2):144.e1-9; discussion 144-5. PubMed ID: 20691354
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The effect of fixed and functional appliances on enamel decalcifications in early Class II treatment.
    Alexander SA.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Jan; 103(1):45-7. PubMed ID: 8422030
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Reduced mandibular cast splints an alternative in Herbst therapy? A prospective multicentre study.
    von Bremen J, Pancherz H, Ruf S.
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Dec; 29(6):609-13. PubMed ID: 17873147
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. An update on the dangers of soda pop.
    Kaplowitz GJ.
    Dent Assist; 2011 Dec; 80(4):14-6, 18-20, 22-3 passim; quiz 29-31. PubMed ID: 21922984
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Maxillary molar distalization or mandibular enhancement: a cephalometric comparison of comprehensive orthodontic treatment including the pendulum and the Herbst appliances.
    Burkhardt DR, McNamara JA, Baccetti T.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Feb; 123(2):108-16. PubMed ID: 12594414
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Centroid analysis of twin-block appliance treatment for Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Trenouth MJ.
    World J Orthod; 2006 Feb; 7(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 16779975
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Research in the field of enamel demineralization and the implications that this has for orthodontic practice.
    McGuinness NJ.
    Br J Orthod; 1992 May; 19(2):166. PubMed ID: 1627530
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Effects of the Herbst appliance in growing orthodontic patients with different underlying vertical patterns.
    Deen E, Woods MG.
    Aust Orthod J; 2015 May; 31(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 26219148
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Evaluating the effect of Sabbagh Universal Spring during treatment of growing class II malocclusions.
    Hanandeh BA, El-Bialy AA.
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2010 May; 21(4):13-24. PubMed ID: 21314084
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The Loudon Chateau repositioning appliance.
    Loudon M.
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2014 May; 25(3):23-9. PubMed ID: 25745720
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 5.