These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

250 related items for PubMed ID: 1579318

  • 1. Single-operator comparison of early and mid-second-trimester amniocentesis.
    Assel BG, Lewis SM, Dickerman LH, Park VM, Jassani MN.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Jun; 79(6):940-4. PubMed ID: 1579318
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Genetic amniocentesis: gestation-specific pregnancy outcome and comparison of outcome following early and traditional amniocentesis.
    Roper EC, Konje JC, De Chazal RC, Duckett DP, Oppenheimer CA, Taylor DJ.
    Prenat Diagn; 1999 Sep; 19(9):803-7. PubMed ID: 10521835
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Prenatal diagnosis in twin gestations: a comparison between second-trimester amniocentesis and first-trimester chorionic villus sampling.
    Wapner RJ, Johnson A, Davis G, Urban A, Morgan P, Jackson L.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jul; 82(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 8515925
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Fetal loss rate after second trimester amniocentesis at different gestational age.
    Saltvedt S, Almström H.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1999 Jan; 78(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 9926885
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Early amniocentesis at 10-12 weeks' gestation.
    Diaz Vega M, De La Cueva P, Leal C, Aisa F.
    Prenat Diagn; 1996 Apr; 16(4):307-12. PubMed ID: 8734803
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Risk factors for procedure-related fetal losses after mid-trimester genetic amniocentesis.
    Kong CW, Leung TN, Leung TY, Chan LW, Sahota DS, Fung TY, Lau TK.
    Prenat Diagn; 2006 Oct; 26(10):925-30. PubMed ID: 16838383
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Prospective study of amniocentesis performed between weeks 9 and 16 of gestation: its feasibility, risks, complications and use in early genetic prenatal diagnosis.
    Elejalde BR, de Elejalde MM, Acuña JM, Thelen D, Trujillo C, Karrmann M.
    Am J Med Genet; 1990 Feb; 35(2):188-96. PubMed ID: 2309757
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Early amniocentesis for cytogenetic diagnosis].
    Lindner C, Hüneke B, Masson D, Schlotfeldt T, Kerber S, Held KR.
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1990 Dec; 50(12):954-8. PubMed ID: 1707842
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Prenatal cytogenetic diagnosis--a current audit. A review of 2000 cases of prenatal cytogenetic diagnoses after amniocentesis, and comparisons with early experience.
    Bell JA, Pearn JH, Wilson BH, Ansford AJ.
    Med J Aust; 1987 Jan 05; 146(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 3796389
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Early amniocentesis.
    Henry GP, Miller WA.
    J Reprod Med; 1992 May 05; 37(5):396-402. PubMed ID: 1507188
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Diagnostic mid trimester amniocentesis: how safe?
    Seeds JW.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Aug 05; 191(2):607-15. PubMed ID: 15343248
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. First-trimester transcervical chorionic villus sampling by biopsy forceps versus mid-trimester amniocentesis: a randomized controlled trial project.
    Borrell A, Fortuny A, Lazaro L, Costa D, Seres A, Pappa S, Soler A.
    Prenat Diagn; 1999 Dec 05; 19(12):1138-42. PubMed ID: 10590432
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [Evaluation of the third trimester amniocentesis for fetal karyotyping in women with fear of pregnancy loss].
    Picone O, Fuchs F, Sénat MV, Brisset S, Tachdjian G, Audibert F, Fernandez H, Frydman R.
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2008 Jun 05; 37(4):385-91. PubMed ID: 18191913
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Rescheduling genetic amniocentesis from the 16th to the 13th/14th week of pregnancy--report of experience].
    Huter O, Brezinka C, Fessler S, Kraft HG, Duba HC.
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1993 Nov 05; 53(11):788-91. PubMed ID: 8293946
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Second-trimester genetic amniocentesis: 5-year experience.
    Turhan NO, Eren U, Seçkin NC.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2005 Jan 05; 271(1):19-21. PubMed ID: 15290165
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Early second trimester (13 to 20 weeks) transabdominal chorionic villus sampling (TA-CVS): a safe and alternative method for both high and low risk populations.
    Brambati B, Tului L, Camurri L, Guercilena S.
    Prenat Diagn; 2002 Oct 05; 22(10):907-13. PubMed ID: 12378575
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Midtrimester amniocentesis. Influence of operator caseload on sampling efficiency.
    Silver RK, Russell TL, Kambich MP, Leeth EA, MacGregor SN, Sholl JS.
    J Reprod Med; 1998 Mar 05; 43(3):191-5. PubMed ID: 9564643
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Prenatal cytogenetic diagnosis. Amniotic cell culture versus chorionic villus sampling.
    Bell JA, Pearn JH, Smith A.
    Med J Aust; 1987 Jan 05; 146(1):27-9. PubMed ID: 3796391
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. A report of early (13 + 0 to 14 + 6 weeks) and mid-trimester amniocenteses: 10 years' experience.
    Centini G, Rosignoli L, Kenanidis A, Scarinci R, Petraglia F.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2003 Aug 05; 14(2):113-7. PubMed ID: 14629092
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Follow-up of 2000 second-trimester amniocenteses.
    Crandall BF, Howard J, Lebherz TB, Rubinstein L, Sample WF, Sarti D.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Nov 05; 56(5):625-8. PubMed ID: 7432734
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.