These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

548 related items for PubMed ID: 15798684

  • 21. Fracture resistance and marginal adaptation of conventionally cemented fiber-reinforced composite three-unit FPDs.
    Behr M, Rosentritt M, Ledwinsky E, Handel G.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(5):467-72. PubMed ID: 12375462
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. In vitro validation of a shape-optimized fiber-reinforced dental bridge.
    Chen Y, Li H, Fok A.
    Dent Mater; 2011 Dec; 27(12):1229-37. PubMed ID: 21944281
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Acoustic emission analysis of fiber-reinforced composite in flexural testing.
    Alander P, Lassila LV, Tezvergil A, Vallittu PK.
    Dent Mater; 2004 May; 20(4):305-12. PubMed ID: 15019443
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Influence of retainer design on two-unit cantilever resin-bonded glass fiber reinforced composite fixed dental prostheses: an in vitro and finite element analysis study.
    Keulemans F, De Jager N, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ.
    J Adhes Dent; 2008 Oct; 10(5):355-64. PubMed ID: 19058681
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
    Dejak B, Mlotkowski A.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Effect of surface treatment on retention of glass-fiber endodontic posts.
    Balbosh A, Kern M.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Mar; 95(3):218-23. PubMed ID: 16543019
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Fracture resistance of fiber-reinforced composite restorations with different framework design.
    Behr M, Rosentritt M, Taubenhansl P, Kolbeck C, Handel G.
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2005 Jun; 63(3):153-7. PubMed ID: 16191908
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 28.