These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


356 related items for PubMed ID: 15801826

  • 21. Knowledge-based scoring functions in drug design: 2. Can the knowledge base be enriched?
    Shen Q, Xiong B, Zheng M, Luo X, Luo C, Liu X, Du Y, Li J, Zhu W, Shen J, Jiang H.
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Feb 28; 51(2):386-97. PubMed ID: 21192670
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. M-score: a knowledge-based potential scoring function accounting for protein atom mobility.
    Yang CY, Wang R, Wang S.
    J Med Chem; 2006 Oct 05; 49(20):5903-11. PubMed ID: 17004706
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Supervised scoring models with docked ligand conformations for structure-based virtual screening.
    Teramoto R, Fukunishi H.
    J Chem Inf Model; 2007 Oct 05; 47(5):1858-67. PubMed ID: 17685604
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Improved protein-ligand docking using GOLD.
    Verdonk ML, Cole JC, Hartshorn MJ, Murray CW, Taylor RD.
    Proteins; 2003 Sep 01; 52(4):609-23. PubMed ID: 12910460
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. PMF scoring revisited.
    Muegge I.
    J Med Chem; 2006 Oct 05; 49(20):5895-902. PubMed ID: 17004705
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Combination of scoring functions improves discrimination in protein-protein docking.
    Murphy J, Gatchell DW, Prasad JC, Vajda S.
    Proteins; 2003 Dec 01; 53(4):840-54. PubMed ID: 14635126
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Estimating protein-ligand binding free energy: atomic solvation parameters for partition coefficient and solvation free energy calculation.
    Pei J, Wang Q, Zhou J, Lai L.
    Proteins; 2004 Dec 01; 57(4):651-64. PubMed ID: 15390269
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Steering protein-ligand docking with quantitative NMR chemical shift perturbations.
    González-Ruiz D, Gohlke H.
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Oct 01; 49(10):2260-71. PubMed ID: 19795907
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Structure-based virtual screening with supervised consensus scoring: evaluation of pose prediction and enrichment factors.
    Teramoto R, Fukunishi H.
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Apr 01; 48(4):747-54. PubMed ID: 18318474
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. A scoring function for docking ligands to low-resolution protein structures.
    Bindewald E, Skolnick J.
    J Comput Chem; 2005 Mar 01; 26(4):374-83. PubMed ID: 15651033
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. SuperStar: improved knowledge-based interaction fields for protein binding sites.
    Verdonk ML, Cole JC, Watson P, Gillet V, Willett P.
    J Mol Biol; 2001 Mar 30; 307(3):841-59. PubMed ID: 11273705
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 18.