These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

294 related items for PubMed ID: 15811699

  • 1. Loudness growth in cochlear implants: effect of stimulation rate and electrode configuration.
    Fu QJ.
    Hear Res; 2005 Apr; 202(1-2):55-62. PubMed ID: 15811699
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Relation between neural response telemetry thresholds, T- and C-levels, and loudness judgments in 12 adult nucleus 24 cochlear implant recipients.
    Potts LG, Skinner MW, Gotter BD, Strube MJ, Brenner CA.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):495-511. PubMed ID: 17609612
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Loudness of simple and complex stimuli in electric hearing.
    Zeng FG, Shannon RV.
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():235-8. PubMed ID: 7668651
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Pitch matching psychometrics in electric acoustic stimulation.
    Baumann U, Rader T, Helbig S, Bahmer A.
    Ear Hear; 2011 Sep; 32(5):656-62. PubMed ID: 21869623
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Effects of pulse rate on thresholds and loudness of biphasic and alternating monophasic pulse trains in electrical hearing.
    van Wieringen A, Carlyon RP, Macherey O, Wouters J.
    Hear Res; 2006 Oct; 220(1-2):49-60. PubMed ID: 16904278
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Effects of phase duration and pulse rate on loudness and pitch percepts in the first auditory midbrain implant patients: Comparison to cochlear implant and auditory brainstem implant results.
    Lim HH, Lenarz T, Joseph G, Battmer RD, Patrick JF, Lenarz M.
    Neuroscience; 2008 Jun 12; 154(1):370-80. PubMed ID: 18384971
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Excitation patterns of simultaneous and sequential dual-electrode stimulation in cochlear implant recipients.
    Saoji AA, Litvak LM, Hughes ML.
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct 12; 30(5):559-67. PubMed ID: 19617837
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Using current steering to increase spectral resolution in CII and HiRes 90K users.
    Koch DB, Downing M, Osberger MJ, Litvak L.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr 12; 28(2 Suppl):38S-41S. PubMed ID: 17496643
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Effect of inter-phase gap on the sensitivity of cochlear implant users to electrical stimulation.
    Carlyon RP, van Wieringen A, Deeks JM, Long CJ, Lyzenga J, Wouters J.
    Hear Res; 2005 Jul 12; 205(1-2):210-24. PubMed ID: 15953530
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Loudness summation for two channels of stimulation in cochlear implants: effects of spatial and temporal separation.
    McKay CM, McDermott HJ, Clark GM.
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep 12; 166():230-3. PubMed ID: 7668649
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Auditory brainstem activity and development evoked by apical versus basal cochlear implant electrode stimulation in children.
    Gordon KA, Papsin BC, Harrison RV.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Aug 12; 118(8):1671-84. PubMed ID: 17588811
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Speech perception performance as a function of stimulus pulse rate and processing strategy preference for the Cochlear Nucleus CI24RE device: relation to perceptual threshold and loudness comfort profiles.
    Battmer RD, Dillier N, Lai WK, Begall K, Leypon EE, González JC, Manrique M, Morera C, Müller-Deile J, Wesarg T, Zarowski A, Killian MJ, von Wallenberg E, Smoorenburg GF.
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Sep 12; 49(9):657-66. PubMed ID: 20583945
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Simultaneous and non-simultaneous dual electrode stimulation in cochlear implants: evidence for two neural response modalities.
    Frijns JH, Kalkman RK, Vanpoucke FJ, Bongers JS, Briaire JJ.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2009 Apr 12; 129(4):433-9. PubMed ID: 19117170
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Sensitivity to interaural level difference and loudness growth with bilateral bimodal stimulation.
    Francart T, Brokx J, Wouters J.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2008 Apr 12; 13(5):309-19. PubMed ID: 18391567
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Effect of high-frequency electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in an animal model of cochlear implants.
    Vischer M, Haenggeli A, Zhang J, Pelizzone M, Häusler R, Rouiller EM.
    Am J Otol; 1997 Nov 12; 18(6 Suppl):S27-9. PubMed ID: 9391586
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A multiple-electrode cochlear implant.
    House WF, Edgerton BJ.
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1982 Nov 12; 91(2 Pt 3):104-16. PubMed ID: 6805389
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.