These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

866 related items for PubMed ID: 15815671

  • 1. Regulating transgenic crops sensibly: lessons from plant breeding, biotechnology and genomics.
    Bradford KJ, Van Deynze A, Gutterson N, Parrott W, Strauss SH.
    Nat Biotechnol; 2005 Apr; 23(4):439-44. PubMed ID: 15815671
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Genetic technologies. Genomics, genetic engineering, and domestication of crops.
    Strauss SH.
    Science; 2003 Apr 04; 300(5616):61-2. PubMed ID: 12677045
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The intragenic approach as a new extension to traditional plant breeding.
    Rommens CM, Haring MA, Swords K, Davies HV, Belknap WR.
    Trends Plant Sci; 2007 Sep 04; 12(9):397-403. PubMed ID: 17692557
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Regulating innovative crop technologies in Canada: the case of regulating genetically modified crops.
    Smyth S, McHughen A.
    Plant Biotechnol J; 2008 Apr 04; 6(3):213-25. PubMed ID: 18028290
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Practical delivery of genes to the marketplace.
    Fischhoff DA, Cline MN.
    Methods Mol Biol; 2009 Apr 04; 513():305-20. PubMed ID: 19347653
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Compliance costs for regulatory approval of new biotech crops.
    Kalaitzandonakes N, Alston JM, Bradford KJ.
    Nat Biotechnol; 2007 May 04; 25(5):509-11. PubMed ID: 17483830
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Apomixis technology development-virgin births in farmers' fields?
    Spillane C, Curtis MD, Grossniklaus U.
    Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Jun 04; 22(6):687-91. PubMed ID: 15175691
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Science, politics, and the GM debate in Europe.
    Tencalla F.
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Feb 04; 44(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 16188360
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Placing on the market, breeders rights and growing genetically modified (GM) varieties].
    Dattée Y.
    J Soc Biol; 2009 Feb 04; 203(4):333-6. PubMed ID: 20122393
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Plants with genetically modified events combined by conventional breeding: an assessment of the need for additional regulatory data.
    Pilacinski W, Crawford A, Downey R, Harvey B, Huber S, Hunst P, Lahman LK, MacIntosh S, Pohl M, Rickard C, Tagliani L, Weber N.
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2011 Jan 04; 49(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 21074592
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Barriers and paths to market for genetically engineered crops.
    Rommens CM.
    Plant Biotechnol J; 2010 Feb 04; 8(2):101-11. PubMed ID: 19968823
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The impact of the EU regulatory constraint of transgenic crops on farm income.
    Park J, McFarlane I, Phipps R, Ceddia G.
    N Biotechnol; 2011 Jul 04; 28(4):396-406. PubMed ID: 21272674
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Genomics-assisted breeding for crop improvement.
    Varshney RK, Graner A, Sorrells ME.
    Trends Plant Sci; 2005 Dec 04; 10(12):621-30. PubMed ID: 16290213
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 44.