These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
145 related items for PubMed ID: 1581999
21. Cavity preparation devices: effect on microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations. Setien VJ, Cobb DS, Denehy GE, Vargas MA. Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 11572294 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Effect of surface treatment on roughness and bond strength of a heat-pressed ceramic. Ayad MF, Fahmy NZ, Rosenstiel SF. J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 18262013 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. A randomized controlled study evaluating the effectiveness of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective phosphoric-acid etching of enamel. Van Meerbeek B, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Peumans M. Dent Mater; 2005 Apr; 21(4):375-83. PubMed ID: 15766585 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Effect of surface treatments on the tensile bond strength of repaired water-aged anterior restorative micro-fine hybrid resin composite. Fawzy AS, El-Askary FS, Amer MA. J Dent; 2008 Dec; 36(12):969-76. PubMed ID: 18842330 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Bond strength of compomers to human enamel. Tate WH, You C, Powers JM. Oper Dent; 2000 Dec; 25(4):283-91. PubMed ID: 11203832 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Influence of incorrect application of a water-based adhesive system on the marginal adaptation of Class V restorations. Peschke A, Blunck U, Roulet JF. Am J Dent; 2000 Oct; 13(5):239-44. PubMed ID: 11764109 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Evaluation of shear bond strength and interfacial micromorphology of direct restorations in primary and permanent teeth--an in vitro study. da Costa CC, Oshima HM, Costa Filho LC. Gen Dent; 2008 Oct; 56(1):85-93; quiz 94-5, 111-2. PubMed ID: 18254567 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Procedures for enamel and dentin conditioning: a comparison of conventional and innovative methods. Moritz A, Schoop U, Goharkhay K, Szakacs S, Sperr W, Schweidler E, Wernisch J, Gutknecht N. J Esthet Dent; 1998 Oct; 10(2):84-93. PubMed ID: 9759027 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. SEM study of a self-etching primer adhesive system used for dentin bonding in primary and permanent teeth. da Silva Telles PD, Aparecida M, Machado M, Nör JE. Pediatr Dent; 2001 Oct; 23(4):315-20. PubMed ID: 11572489 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Effect of mode of conditioning treatment on efficacy of dentin bonding. Uno S, Finger WJ. Oper Dent; 1996 Oct; 21(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 8957913 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Effect of dentin conditioners on the microtensile bond strength of a conventional and a self-etching primer adhesive system. Jacques P, Hebling J. Dent Mater; 2005 Feb; 21(2):103-9. PubMed ID: 15681008 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Bonding to etched, physiologically hydrated dentin. Elhabashy A, Swift EJ. Am J Dent; 1994 Feb; 7(1):50-2. PubMed ID: 9115682 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Marginal adaptation of Class 5 composite restorations: retention grooves versus enamel and dentin bonding. Farid MR, Gomaa HM. Egypt Dent J; 1995 Jul; 41(3):1271-5. PubMed ID: 9497668 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Resin bonding to primary teeth using three adhesive systems. Mazzeo N, Ott NW, Hondrum SO. Pediatr Dent; 1995 Jul; 17(2):112-5. PubMed ID: 7603904 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The effect of immediate dentin sealing on the marginal adaptation and bond strengths of total-etch and self-etch adhesives. Duarte S, de Freitas CR, Saad JR, Sadan A. J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jul; 102(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 19573687 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Microleakage of composite resin restorations in cervical cavities prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser radiation. Shahabi S, Ebrahimpour L, Walsh LJ. Aust Dent J; 2008 Jun; 53(2):172-5. PubMed ID: 18494974 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]