These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
46 related items for PubMed ID: 1583271
1. Rotary Diamond Chart--a new visual field screening device. Freed DM, Semes LP, Potter JW. J Am Optom Assoc; 1992 Feb; 63(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 1583271 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The illuminated high contrast macular grid: a pilot study. Achiron LR, Witkin NS, McCarey B, Primo S. J Am Optom Assoc; 1995 Nov; 66(11):693-7. PubMed ID: 8576534 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Reading performance in patients with retinitis pigmentosa: a study using the MNREAD charts. Virgili G, Pierrottet C, Parmeggiani F, Pennino M, Giacomelli G, Steindler P, Menchini U, Orzalesi N, MNREAD charts. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2004 Oct; 45(10):3418-24. PubMed ID: 15452044 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Symptomatic and asymptomatic visual loss in patients taking vigabatrin. Daneshvar H, Racette L, Coupland SG, Kertes PJ, Guberman A, Zackon D. Ophthalmology; 1999 Sep; 106(9):1792-8. PubMed ID: 10485552 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [A study of Humphrey three zone screening to detect visual field of the patients with pituitary macroadenomas]. Fang Q, Huang Q, Chen Z. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Sep; 37(5):370-2. PubMed ID: 11770408 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Progression of visual field defects in leber hereditary optic neuropathy: experience of the LHON treatment trial. Newman NJ, Biousse V, Newman SA, Bhatti MT, Hamilton SR, Farris BK, Lesser RL, Turbin RE. Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Jun; 141(6):1061-1067. PubMed ID: 16765674 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Sensitivity and specificity of frequency doubling perimetry in neuro-ophthalmic disorders: a comparison with conventional automated perimetry. Wall M, Neahring RK, Woodward KR. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Apr; 43(4):1277-83. PubMed ID: 11923276 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Visual-field defects in well-defined retinal lesions using Humphrey and Dicon perimeters. Bass SJ, Feldman J. Optometry; 2000 Oct; 71(10):643-52. PubMed ID: 11063269 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of an automated confrontation testing device versus finger counting in the detection of field loss. Bass SJ, Cooper J, Feldman J, Horn D. Optometry; 2007 Aug; 78(8):390-5. PubMed ID: 17662927 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma. Artes PH, Hutchison DM, Nicolela MT, LeBlanc RP, Chauhan BC. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The ability of Medmont M600 automated perimetry to detect threats to fixation. Zhang L, Drance SM, Douglas GR. J Glaucoma; 1997 Aug; 6(4):259-62. PubMed ID: 9264306 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnostic sensitivity of fast blue-yellow and standard automated perimetry in early glaucoma: a comparison between different test programs. Bengtsson B, Heijl A. Ophthalmology; 2006 Jul; 113(7):1092-7. PubMed ID: 16815399 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]