These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
42. Porcelain versus composite inlays/onlays: effects of mechanical loads on stress distribution, adhesion, and crown flexure. Magne P, Belser UC. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2003 Dec; 23(6):543-55. PubMed ID: 14703758 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Effect of occlusal contact size on interfacial stresses and failure of a bonded ceramic: FEA and monotonic loading analyses. Yi YJ, Kelly JR. Dent Mater; 2008 Mar; 24(3):403-9. PubMed ID: 17698187 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Influence of the type of post and core on in vitro marginal continuity, fracture resistance, and fracture mode of lithia disilicate-based all-ceramic crowns. Forberger N, Göhring TN. J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Oct; 100(4):264-73. PubMed ID: 18922255 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Influence of post-etching cleaning and connecting porcelain on the microtensile bond strength of composite resin to feldspathic porcelain. Magne P, Cascione D. J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Nov; 96(5):354-61. PubMed ID: 17098499 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Unstable cracking (chipping) of veneering porcelain on all-ceramic dental crowns and fixed partial dentures. Swain MV. Acta Biomater; 2009 Jun; 5(5):1668-77. PubMed ID: 19201268 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. The influence of different core material on the FEA-determined stress distribution in dental crowns. De Jager N, de Kler M, van der Zel JM. Dent Mater; 2006 Mar; 22(3):234-42. PubMed ID: 16099031 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Fracture strength of all-ceramic crowns with varying core elastic moduli. Lee SK, Wilson PR. Aust Dent J; 2000 Jun; 45(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 10925505 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Resin strengthening of dental ceramics- the impact of surface texture and silane. Addison O, Marquis PM, Fleming GJ. J Dent; 2007 May; 35(5):416-24. PubMed ID: 17222957 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. An investigation into the role of core porcelain thickness and lamination in determining the flexural strength of In-Ceram dental materials. Alshehri SA. J Prosthodont; 2011 Jun; 20(4):261-6. PubMed ID: 21535292 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. An evaluation of the effects of handpiece speed, abrasive characteristics, and polishing load on the flexural strength of polished ceramics. Ahmad R, Morgano SM, Wu BM, Giordano RA. J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Nov; 94(5):421-9. PubMed ID: 16275301 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Comparison of two bond strength testing methodologies for bilayered all-ceramics. Dündar M, Ozcan M, Gökçe B, Cömlekoğlu E, Leite F, Valandro LF. Dent Mater; 2007 May; 23(5):630-6. PubMed ID: 16844212 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Fracture strength of four-unit Y-TZP FPD cores designed with varying connector diameter. An in-vitro study. Larsson C, Holm L, Lövgren N, Kokubo Y, Vult von Steyern P. J Oral Rehabil; 2007 Sep; 34(9):702-9. PubMed ID: 17716270 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. A clinical evaluation of cobalt-chromium metal-ceramic fixed partial dentures and crowns: A three- to seven-year retrospective study. Eliasson A, Arnelund CF, Johansson A. J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jul; 98(1):6-16. PubMed ID: 17631169 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]