These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

196 related items for PubMed ID: 1584032

  • 1. The Stanford-Binet: Fourth Edition and form L-M in assessment of young children with mental retardation.
    Wilson WM.
    Ment Retard; 1992 Apr; 30(2):81-4. PubMed ID: 1584032
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Concurrent validity study of the Slosson Intelligence Test-Revised in mental retardation testing.
    Kunen S, Overstreet S, Salles C.
    Ment Retard; 1996 Dec; 34(6):380-6. PubMed ID: 8990822
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Ratio developmental quotients from the Bayley are comparable to later IQs from the Stanford-Binet.
    Goldstein DJ, Sheaffer CI.
    Am J Ment Retard; 1988 Jan; 92(4):379-80. PubMed ID: 3342140
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Reliability and validity of ratio developmental quotients from the Cattell Infant Intelligence Scale.
    Atkinson L.
    Am J Ment Retard; 1990 Sep; 95(2):215-9. PubMed ID: 1699557
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Disparities in mentally retarded persons' IQs derived from different intelligence tests.
    Spitz HH.
    Am J Ment Defic; 1986 Mar; 90(5):588-91. PubMed ID: 3953693
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Infant assessment: stability of mental functioning in young retarded children.
    VanderVeer B, Schweid E.
    Am J Ment Defic; 1974 Jul; 79(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 4432879
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Assessment of preschoolers at-risk with the WPPSI--R and the Stanford-Binet L-M.
    Gerken KC, Hodapp AF.
    Psychol Rep; 1992 Oct; 71(2):659-64. PubMed ID: 1410125
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Stanford-Binet, Fourth Edition and the WISC--R for children in the lower range of intelligence.
    Lukens J.
    Percept Mot Skills; 1990 Jun; 70(3 Pt 1):819-22. PubMed ID: 2377415
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Intellectual evaluations of children using human figure drawings: an empirical investigation of two methods.
    Abell SC, von Briesen PD, Watz LS.
    J Clin Psychol; 1996 Jan; 52(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 8682914
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Strengths and weaknesses in the intellectual functioning of males with fragile X syndrome.
    Dykens EM, Hodapp RM, Leckman JF.
    Am J Ment Defic; 1987 Sep; 92(2):234-6. PubMed ID: 3434594
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.