These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

402 related items for PubMed ID: 15840362

  • 21. Impact of diabetes on glaucoma screening using frequency-doubling perimetry.
    Realini T, Lai MQ, Barber L.
    Ophthalmology; 2004 Nov; 111(11):2133-6. PubMed ID: 15522382
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Frequency-doubling technology: searching for the optimum diagnostic criteria for glaucoma.
    Ferreras A, Larrosa JM, Polo V, Pajarín AB, Mayoral F, Honrubia FM.
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2007 Feb; 85(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 17244214
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Comparison of standard automated perimetry with matrix frequency-doubling technology in patients with resolved optic neuritis.
    Sakai T, Matsushima M, Shikishima K, Kitahara K.
    Ophthalmology; 2007 May; 114(5):949-56. PubMed ID: 17382395
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.
    Artes PH, Hutchison DM, Nicolela MT, LeBlanc RP, Chauhan BC.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Relationship between Humphrey 30-2 SITA Standard Test, Matrix 30-2 threshold test, and Heidelberg retina tomograph in ocular hypertensive and glaucoma patients.
    Bozkurt B, Yilmaz PT, Irkec M.
    J Glaucoma; 2008 Jul; 17(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 18414106
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Can frequency-doubling technology and short-wavelength automated perimetries detect visual field defects before standard automated perimetry in patients with preperimetric glaucoma?
    Ferreras A, Polo V, Larrosa JM, Pablo LE, Pajarin AB, Pueyo V, Honrubia FM.
    J Glaucoma; 2007 Jul; 16(4):372-83. PubMed ID: 17571000
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. [The prevalence and its screening methods of primary open angle glaucoma in defined population-based study of rural and urban in Beijing].
    Xu L, Chen JH, Li JJ, Luo L, Yang H, Zhang RX, Sun XY, Zheng YY, Song WX, Shi YY, Zhang SY, Sun BC, Zhao JL, Ma BR.
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Nov; 40(11):726-32. PubMed ID: 15634477
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. False-negative responses in glaucoma perimetry: indicators of patient performance or test reliability?
    Bengtsson B, Heijl A.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Jul; 41(8):2201-4. PubMed ID: 10892863
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 21.