These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. A multicenter evaluation of the Iris iQ200 automated urine microscopy analyzer body fluids module and comparison with hemacytometer cell counts. Butch AW, Wises PK, Wah DT, Gornet TG, Fritsche HA. Am J Clin Pathol; 2008 Mar; 129(3):445-50. PubMed ID: 18285268 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Urine sediment examination: a comparison of automated urinalysis systems and manual microscopy. Chien TI, Kao JT, Liu HL, Lin PC, Hong JS, Hsieh HP, Chien MJ. Clin Chim Acta; 2007 Sep; 384(1-2):28-34. PubMed ID: 17604012 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Urine sediment examination: a comparison between the manual method and the iQ200 automated urine microscopy analyzer. Lamchiagdhase P, Preechaborisutkul K, Lomsomboon P, Srisuchart P, Tantiniti P, Khan-u-Ra N, Preechaborisutkul B. Clin Chim Acta; 2005 Aug; 358(1-2):167-74. PubMed ID: 16018883 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Analytical performance of the Iris iQ200 automated urine microscopy analyzer. Linko S, Kouri TT, Toivonen E, Ranta PH, Chapoulaud E, Lalla M. Clin Chim Acta; 2006 Oct; 372(1-2):54-64. PubMed ID: 16696963 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Evaluation of iQ200 automated urine microscopy analyzer]. Park J, Kim J. Korean J Lab Med; 2008 Aug; 28(4):267-73. PubMed ID: 18728375 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The clinical reliability of automated cerebrospinal fluid cell counts on the Beckman-Coulter LH750 and Iris iQ200. Glasser L, Murphy CA, Machan JT. Am J Clin Pathol; 2009 Jan; 131(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 19095566 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative evaluation of the Iris iQ200 body fluid module with manual hemacytometer count. Walker TJ, Nelson LD, Dunphy BW, Anderson DM, Kickler TS. Am J Clin Pathol; 2009 Mar; 131(3):333-8. PubMed ID: 19228639 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of LabUMat-with-UriSed and iQ200 fully automatic urine sediment analysers with manual urine analysis. Akin OK, Serdar MA, Cizmeci Z, Genc O, Aydin S. Biotechnol Appl Biochem; 2009 Jun; 53(Pt 2):139-44. PubMed ID: 19021504 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Urine analysis performed by flow cytometry: reference range determination and comparison to morphological findings, dipstick chemistry and bacterial culture results--a multicenter study. Regeniter A, Haenni V, Risch L, Köchli HP, Colombo JP, Frei R, Huber AR. Clin Nephrol; 2001 May; 55(5):384-92. PubMed ID: 11393384 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Automated urinalysis. Evaluation of the Sysmex UF-50. Okada H, Sakai Y, Kawabata G, Fujisawa M, Arakawa S, Hamaguchi Y, Kamidono S. Am J Clin Pathol; 2001 Apr; 115(4):605-10. PubMed ID: 11293910 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Urine sediment analysis: Analytical and diagnostic performance of sediMAX - a new automated microscopy image-based urine sediment analyser. Zaman Z, Fogazzi GB, Garigali G, Croci MD, Bayer G, Kránicz T. Clin Chim Acta; 2010 Feb; 411(3-4):147-54. PubMed ID: 19861122 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Cobas 6500 and Iris IQ200 fully-automated urine analyzers to manual urine microscopy. Bakan E, Ozturk N, Baygutalp NK, Polat E, Akpinar K, Dorman E, Polat H, Bakan N. Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2016 Oct 15; 26(3):365-375. PubMed ID: 27812305 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical laboratory automated urinalysis: comparison among automated microscopy, flow cytometry, two test strips analyzers, and manual microscopic examination of the urine sediments. Mayo S, Acevedo D, Quiñones-Torrelo C, Canós I, Sancho M. J Clin Lab Anal; 2008 Oct 15; 22(4):262-70. PubMed ID: 18623125 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. An evaluation of the cell-dyn 3200 for counting cells in cerebrospinal and other body fluids. Andrews J, Setran E, McDonnel L, Kussick S, Wood BL, Sabath DE. Lab Hematol; 2005 Oct 15; 11(2):98-106. PubMed ID: 16024333 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Urine particle evaluation: a comparison between the UF-1000i and quantitative microscopy. Manoni F, Tinello A, Fornasiero L, Hoffer P, Temporin V, Valverde S, Gessoni G. Clin Chem Lab Med; 2010 Aug 15; 48(8):1107-11. PubMed ID: 20482296 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Flow cytometric validation of automated differentials in pediatric patients. Finn LS, Hall J, Xu M, Rutledge JC. Lab Hematol; 2004 Aug 15; 10(2):112-8. PubMed ID: 15224768 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]