These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

905 related items for PubMed ID: 15856706

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Passerine extrapair mating dynamics: a bayesian modeling approach comparing four species.
    Brommer JE, Alho JS, Biard C, Chapman JR, Charmantier A, Dreiss A, Hartley IR, Hjernquist MB, Kempenaers B, Komdeur J, Laaksonen T, Lehtonen PK, Lubjuhn T, Patrick SC, Rosivall B, Tinbergen JM, van der Velde M, van Oers K, Wilk T, Winkel W.
    Am Nat; 2010 Aug; 176(2):178-87. PubMed ID: 20528475
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. A model for evolution of male parental care and female multiple mating.
    Ihara Y.
    Am Nat; 2002 Aug; 160(2):235-44. PubMed ID: 18707489
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Evolution of mate choice for genome-wide heterozygosity.
    Fromhage L, Kokko H, Reid JM.
    Evolution; 2009 Mar; 63(3):684-94. PubMed ID: 19220455
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Estimating genetic benefits of polyandry from experimental studies: a meta-analysis.
    Slatyer RA, Mautz BS, Backwell PR, Jennions MD.
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2012 Feb; 87(1):1-33. PubMed ID: 21545390
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. MHC-dependent survival in a wild population: evidence for hidden genetic benefits gained through extra-pair fertilizations.
    Brouwer L, Barr I, van de Pol M, Burke T, Komdeur J, Richardson DS.
    Mol Ecol; 2010 Aug; 19(16):3444-55. PubMed ID: 20670363
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Evolution of male parental care and female multiple mating: game-theoretical and two-locus diploid models.
    Wakano JY, Ihara Y.
    Am Nat; 2005 Aug; 166(2):E32-44. PubMed ID: 16032569
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Sexy sons from re-mating do not recoup the direct costs of harmful male interactions in the Drosophila melanogaster laboratory model system.
    Orteiza N, Linder JE, Rice WR.
    J Evol Biol; 2005 Sep; 18(5):1315-23. PubMed ID: 16135126
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Fertility assurance through extrapair fertilization, and male parental effort.
    Fishman MA, Stone L.
    Bull Math Biol; 2002 Jul; 64(4):809-23. PubMed ID: 12216422
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Mate choice evolution, dominance effects, and the maintenance of genetic variation.
    Lehmann L, Keller LF, Kokko H.
    J Theor Biol; 2007 Jan 21; 244(2):282-95. PubMed ID: 16979189
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Mate choice for non-additive genetic benefits: a resolution to the lek paradox.
    Neff BD, Pitcher TE.
    J Theor Biol; 2008 Sep 07; 254(1):147-55. PubMed ID: 18589454
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Female mating bias results in conflicting sex-specific offspring fitness.
    Fedorka KM, Mousseau TA.
    Nature; 2004 May 06; 429(6987):65-7. PubMed ID: 15129280
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Paternal indirect genetic effects on offspring viability and the benefits of polyandry.
    García-González F, Simmons LW.
    Curr Biol; 2007 Jan 09; 17(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 17208183
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Mating frequency and inclusive fitness in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Priest NK, Galloway LF, Roach DA.
    Am Nat; 2008 Jan 09; 171(1):10-21. PubMed ID: 18171147
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Physiological effects on demography: a long-term experimental study of testosterone's effects on fitness.
    Reed WL, Clark ME, Parker PG, Raouf SA, Arguedas N, Monk DS, Snajdr E, Nolan V, Ketterson ED.
    Am Nat; 2006 May 09; 167(5):667-83. PubMed ID: 16671011
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Mate choice for nonadditive genetic benefits correlate with MHC dissimilarity in the rose bitterling (Rhodeus ocellatus).
    Agbali M, Reichard M, Bryjová A, Bryja J, Smith C.
    Evolution; 2010 Jun 09; 64(6):1683-96. PubMed ID: 20148959
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Fitness consequences of parental compatibility in the frog Crinia georgiana.
    Dziminski MA, Roberts JD, Simmons LW.
    Evolution; 2008 Apr 09; 62(4):879-86. PubMed ID: 18208566
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. The evolution of infidelity in socially monogamous passerines: neglected components of direct and indirect selection.
    Griffith SC.
    Am Nat; 2007 Feb 09; 169(2):274-81; discussion 282-3. PubMed ID: 17211810
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Natal dispersal and parental escorting predict relatedness between mates in a passerine bird.
    van de Casteele T, Matthysen E.
    Mol Ecol; 2006 Aug 09; 15(9):2557-65. PubMed ID: 16842426
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Females benefit from multiple mating but not multiple mates in the burying beetle Nicrophorus vespilloides.
    House CM, Walling CA, Stamper CE, Moore AJ.
    J Evol Biol; 2009 Sep 09; 22(9):1961-6. PubMed ID: 19682308
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 46.