These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


159 related items for PubMed ID: 15863538

  • 1. Vaginal thickness, cross-sectional area, and perimeter in women with and those without prolapse.
    Hsu Y, Chen L, Delancey JO, Ashton-Miller JA.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 May; 105(5 Pt 1):1012-7. PubMed ID: 15863538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Assessment and grading of pelvic organ prolapse by use of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging.
    Singh K, Reid WM, Berger LA.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Jul; 185(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 11483907
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Are pelvic floor muscle thickness and size of levator hiatus associated with pelvic floor muscle strength, endurance and vaginal resting pressure in women with pelvic organ prolapse stages I-III? A cross sectional 3D ultrasound study.
    Braekken IH, Majida M, Engh ME, Bø K.
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2014 Jan; 33(1):115-20. PubMed ID: 23444289
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Quantification of levator ani cross-sectional area differences between women with and those without prolapse.
    Hsu Y, Chen L, Huebner M, Ashton-Miller JA, DeLancey JO.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Oct; 108(4):879-83. PubMed ID: 17012449
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Do patient characteristics impact the relationship between anatomic prolapse and vaginal bulge symptoms?
    Kowalski JT, Melero GH, Mahal A, Genadry R, Bradley CS.
    Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Mar; 28(3):391-396. PubMed ID: 27682132
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Computed tomography comparison of bony pelvis dimensions between women with and without genital prolapse.
    Sze EH, Kohli N, Miklos JR, Roat T, Karram MM.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Feb; 93(2):229-32. PubMed ID: 9932561
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison of supine magnetic resonance imaging with and without rectal contrast to fluoroscopic cystocolpoproctography for the diagnosis of pelvic organ prolapse.
    Pannu HK, Scatarige JC, Eng J.
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009 Feb; 33(1):125-30. PubMed ID: 19188799
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Levator plate angle in women with pelvic organ prolapse compared to women with normal support using dynamic MR imaging.
    Hsu Y, Summers A, Hussain HK, Guire KE, Delancey JO.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 May; 194(5):1427-33. PubMed ID: 16579940
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of levator ani muscle defects and function in women with and without pelvic organ prolapse.
    DeLancey JO, Morgan DM, Fenner DE, Kearney R, Guire K, Miller JM, Hussain H, Umek W, Hsu Y, Ashton-Miller JA.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Feb; 109(2 Pt 1):295-302. PubMed ID: 17267827
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Posterior vaginal prolapse shape and position changes at maximal Valsalva seen in 3-D MRI-based models.
    Luo J, Larson KA, Fenner DE, Ashton-Miller JA, DeLancey JO.
    Int Urogynecol J; 2012 Sep; 23(9):1301-6. PubMed ID: 22527556
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Does the vaginal wall become thinner as prolapse grade increases?
    Bray R, Derpapas A, Fernando R, Khullar V, Panayi DC.
    Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Mar; 28(3):397-402. PubMed ID: 27678142
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparison of measurement systems for posterior vaginal wall prolapse on magnetic resonance imaging.
    Xie B, Chen L, Xue Z, English EM, Fenner DE, Gaetke-Udager K, Kolenic GE, Ashton-Miller JA, DeLancey JO.
    Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Aug; 30(8):1269-1277. PubMed ID: 30972442
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Systemic and vaginal biomechanical properties of women with normal vaginal support and pelvic organ prolapse.
    Epstein LB, Graham CA, Heit MH.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Aug; 197(2):165.e1-6. PubMed ID: 17689636
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Morphometric analysis of smooth muscle in the anterior vaginal wall of women with pelvic organ prolapse.
    Boreham MK, Wai CY, Miller RT, Schaffer JI, Word RA.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Jul; 187(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 12114889
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Incidence of pelvic organ prolapse in Nigerian women.
    Okonkwo JE, Obiechina NJ, Obionu CN.
    J Natl Med Assoc; 2003 Feb; 95(2):132-6. PubMed ID: 12760608
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Pelvic organ support and prevalence by Pelvic Organ Prolapse-Quantification (POP-Q) in Korean women.
    Seo JT, Kim JM.
    J Urol; 2006 May; 175(5):1769-72. PubMed ID: 16600755
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The role of apical vaginal support in the appearance of anterior and posterior vaginal prolapse.
    Lowder JL, Park AJ, Ellison R, Ghetti C, Moalli P, Zyczynski H, Weber AM.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jan; 111(1):152-7. PubMed ID: 18165404
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Smooth muscle myosin heavy chain and caldesmon expression in the anterior vaginal wall of women with and without pelvic organ prolapse.
    Boreham MK, Miller RT, Schaffer JI, Word RA.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct; 185(4):944-52. PubMed ID: 11641683
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Symptoms of anal incontinence and difficult defecation among women with prolapse and a matched control cohort.
    Morgan DM, DeLancey JO, Guire KE, Fenner DE.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Nov; 197(5):509.e1-6. PubMed ID: 17714680
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Magnetic resonance imaging-based three-dimensional model of anterior vaginal wall position at rest and maximal strain in women with and without prolapse.
    Larson KA, Hsu Y, Chen L, Ashton-Miller JA, DeLancey JO.
    Int Urogynecol J; 2010 Sep; 21(9):1103-9. PubMed ID: 20449568
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.