These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

174 related items for PubMed ID: 15867754

  • 1. An in vitro comparison of cast metal dowel retention using various luting agents and tensile loading.
    Ertugrul HZ, Ismail YH.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 May; 93(5):446-52. PubMed ID: 15867754
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of titanium dowel retention using four different luting agents.
    Balbosh A, Ludwig K, Kern M.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Sep; 94(3):227-33. PubMed ID: 16126075
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of two luting agents used for the retention of cast dowel and cores.
    Habib B, von Fraunhofer JA, Driscoll CF.
    J Prosthodont; 2005 Sep; 14(3):164-9. PubMed ID: 16336233
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Tensile bond strength of cast commercially pure titanium and cast gold-alloy posts and cores cemented with two luting agents.
    Menani LR, Ribeiro RF, Antunes RP.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):141-7. PubMed ID: 18262015
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Retention strengths of five luting cements on prefabricated dowels after root canal obturation with a zinc oxide/eugenol sealer: 1. Dowel space preparation/cementation at one week after obturation.
    Hagge MS, Wong RD, Lindemuth JS.
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Sep; 11(3):168-75. PubMed ID: 12237797
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Effect of surface treatment of titanium posts on the tensile bond strength.
    Schmage P, Sohn J, Ozcan M, Nergiz I.
    Dent Mater; 2006 Feb; 22(2):189-94. PubMed ID: 16039707
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The use of reinforced composite resin cement as compensation for reduced post length.
    Nissan J, Dmitry Y, Assif D.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):304-8. PubMed ID: 11552168
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Effect of an adhesive resin luting agent on the dowel-head retention of three different core materials.
    Aksoy G, Cotert HS, Korkut L.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 May; 93(5):439-45. PubMed ID: 15867753
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Fatigue resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with three dowel-and-core systems.
    Goto Y, Nicholls JI, Phillips KM, Junge T.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 15623997
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The retention of cast metal dowels fabricated by direct and indirect techniques.
    Al-Omari WM, Zagibeh AM.
    J Prosthodont; 2010 Jan; 19(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 19765197
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Retentive properties of five different luting cements on base and noble metal copings.
    Ergin S, Gemalmaz D.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Nov; 88(5):491-7. PubMed ID: 12473998
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [The effect of different fabrication methods and luting cements on post retention].
    Ma HM, Li ZC, Li H, Chen X.
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2004 Apr; 22(2):152-4. PubMed ID: 15190802
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The retentive effects of pre-fabricated posts by luting cements.
    Sen D, Poyrazoglu E, Tuncelli B.
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Jun; 31(6):585-9. PubMed ID: 15189317
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Influence of tooth preparation taper and cement type on recementation strength of complete metal crowns.
    Ayad MF, Johnston WM, Rosenstiel SF.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Dec; 102(6):354-61. PubMed ID: 19961993
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The comparison of provisional luting agents and abutment surface roughness on the retention of provisional implant-supported crowns.
    Kim Y, Yamashita J, Shotwell JL, Chong KH, Wang HL.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):450-5. PubMed ID: 16765158
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Effect of two axial wall height preparations on the retentive properties of full crowns using three different cements.
    Martins-Pinto MG, Pisani-Proenca J, Erhardt MC, Spielmann C, Del Castillo-Salmeron R, Lopes LA.
    Gen Dent; 2008 Jun; 56(6):569-73; quiz 574-5, 591-2. PubMed ID: 18810919
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Effect of zirconium-oxide ceramic surface treatments on the bond strength to adhesive resin.
    Atsu SS, Kilicarslan MA, Kucukesmen HC, Aka PS.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):430-6. PubMed ID: 16765155
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Finite element analysis of stresses in endodontically treated, dowel-restored teeth.
    Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A, Sahafi A.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):321-9. PubMed ID: 16198168
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Effect of surface treatment on retention of glass-fiber endodontic posts.
    Balbosh A, Kern M.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Mar; 95(3):218-23. PubMed ID: 16543019
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. In vitro retentive strength of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns using different luting agents.
    Ernst CP, Cohnen U, Stender E, Willershausen B.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jun; 93(6):551-8. PubMed ID: 15942616
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.