These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
457 related items for PubMed ID: 15883942
21. [Establishment of the animal models of mandibular distraction osteogenesis]. Wei M, Zhang DS, Feng SZ. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 1999 Nov; 13(6):377-81. PubMed ID: 12080842 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Condylar cartilaginous changes after mandibular distraction osteogenesis in rabbits. Ahn SY, Kim SG. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Oct; 112(4):416-22. PubMed ID: 21288746 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Distraction bone healing. Karaharju EO, Aalto K, Kahri A, Lindberg LA, Kallio T, Karaharju-Suvanto T, Vauhkonen M, Peltonen J. Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1993 Dec; (297):38-43. PubMed ID: 8242947 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Effects of cortical bone perforation on periosteal distraction: an experimental study in the rabbit mandible. Oda T, Kinoshita K, Ueda M. J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 67(7):1478-85. PubMed ID: 19531421 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Angiogenesis is enhanced by continuous traction in rabbit mandibular distraction osteogenesis. Zheng LW, Ma L, Cheung LK. J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Oct; 37(7):405-11. PubMed ID: 19428266 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Proliferation of masseter myocytes after distraction osteogenesis of the porcine mandible. Castaño FJ, Troulis MJ, Glowacki J, Kaban LB, Yates KE. J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Mar; 59(3):302-7. PubMed ID: 11243613 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of different distraction rates in the mandible: an experimental investigation. al Ruhaimi KA. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Jun; 30(3):220-7. PubMed ID: 11420905 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Preliminary investigation into the effects of electrical stimulation on mandibular distraction osteogenesis in goats. El-Hakim IE, Azim AM, El-Hassan MF, Maree SM. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 Jan; 33(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 14690658 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Effects of locally applied nerve growth factor to the inferior alveolar nerve histology in a rabbit model of mandibular distraction osteogenesis. Wang L, Zhao Y, Cheng X, Yang Y, Liu G, Ma Q, Shang H, Tian L, Lei D. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 38(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 19108991 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Analysis of the performance of different orthodontic devices for mandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis. Boccaccio A, Cozzani M, Pappalettere C. Eur J Orthod; 2011 Apr; 33(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 20709724 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. The effect of mandibular distraction osteogenesis on the histology and immunohistology of keratinized gingiva. Kunimori K, Maruoka Y, Sato M, Harada K, Omura K. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Jun; 103(6):738-44. PubMed ID: 17449290 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Effect of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 on mandibular distraction osteogenesis. Ozeç Y, Oztürk M, Kýlýç E, Yeler H, Göze F, Gümüş C. J Craniofac Surg; 2006 Jan; 17(1):80-3. PubMed ID: 16432412 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. [Effect of bone morphogenetic proteins-2 on mandibular distraction osteogenesis in rabbits]. Chen AW, Wei FC, Wang KT, Sun SZ, Liu SH. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Jan; 42(1):15-7. PubMed ID: 17331435 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Histomorphometric evaluation of short-term changes in masseter muscle after lengthening the rabbit mandible by distraction osteogenesis. Tüz HH, Kisnisci RS, Günhan O. J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 May; 61(5):615-20. PubMed ID: 12730842 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Effect of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 on mandibular distraction at different rates in an experimental model. Cheung LK, Zheng LW. J Craniofac Surg; 2006 Jan; 17(1):100-8; discussion 109-10. PubMed ID: 16432416 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Biomechanical analysis of the effect of mesenchymal stem cells on mandibular distraction osteogenesis. Aykan A, Ozturk S, Sahin I, Gurses S, Ural AU, Oren NC, Isik S. J Craniofac Surg; 2013 Mar; 24(2):e169-75. PubMed ID: 23524827 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Histomorphometrical analysis of new bone obtained by distraction osteogenesis and osteogenesis by periosteal distraction in rabbits. Sencimen M, Aydintug YS, Ortakoglu K, Karslioglu Y, Gunhan O, Gunaydin Y. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Mar; 36(3):235-42. PubMed ID: 17142009 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Effects of simvastatin on mandibular distraction osteogenesis. Kiliç E, Ozeç I, Yeler H, Korkmaz A, Ayas B, Gümüş C. J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Nov; 66(11):2233-8. PubMed ID: 18940485 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Use of a new curvilinear distractor to repair mandibular defects in dogs. Shang H, Lin X, Du J, He L, Liu Y. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Mar; 50(2):166-70. PubMed ID: 21470726 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The role of latency in mandibular osteodistraction. Tavakoli K, Walsh WR, Bonar F, Smart R, Wulf S, Poole MD. J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 1998 Aug; 26(4):209-19. PubMed ID: 9777499 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]