These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


164 related items for PubMed ID: 15893338

  • 1. Reinforcement learning for a stochastic automaton modelling predation in stationary model-mimic environments.
    Tsoularis A, Wallace J.
    Math Biosci; 2005 May; 195(1):76-91. PubMed ID: 15893338
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A learning strategy for predator preying on edible and inedible prey.
    Tsoularis A.
    Acta Biotheor; 2007 May; 55(3):283-95. PubMed ID: 17763829
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Stochastic modelling of prey depletion processes.
    Clerc T, Davison AC, Bersier LF.
    J Theor Biol; 2009 Aug 07; 259(3):523-32. PubMed ID: 19409907
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Natural selection on unpalatable species imposed by state-dependent foraging behaviour.
    Sherratt TN, Speed MP, Ruxton GD.
    J Theor Biol; 2004 May 21; 228(2):217-26. PubMed ID: 15094016
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The application of temporal difference learning in optimal diet models.
    Teichmann J, Broom M, Alonso E.
    J Theor Biol; 2014 Jan 07; 340():11-6. PubMed ID: 24036204
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Conditions for the spread of conspicuous warning signals: a numerical model with novel insights.
    Puurtinen M, Kaitala V.
    Evolution; 2006 Nov 07; 60(11):2246-56. PubMed ID: 17236418
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The Lotka-Volterra predator-prey model with foraging-predation risk trade-offs.
    Krivan V.
    Am Nat; 2007 Nov 07; 170(5):771-82. PubMed ID: 17926298
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Evolutionary consequences of predation for pathogens in prey.
    Martcheva M.
    Bull Math Biol; 2009 May 07; 71(4):819-44. PubMed ID: 19263176
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Efficiency evaluation of two competing foraging modes under different conditions.
    Scharf I, Nulman E, Ovadia O, Bouskila A.
    Am Nat; 2006 Sep 07; 168(3):350-7. PubMed ID: 16947110
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The influence of vigilance on intraguild predation.
    Kimbrell T, Holt RD, Lundberg P.
    J Theor Biol; 2007 Nov 21; 249(2):218-34. PubMed ID: 17888456
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Predator-prey dynamics in P systems ruled by metabolic algorithm.
    Fontana F, Manca V.
    Biosystems; 2008 Mar 21; 91(3):545-57. PubMed ID: 17720307
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Nonlinear functional response parameter estimation in a stochastic predator-prey model.
    Gilioli G, Pasquali S, Ruggeri F.
    Math Biosci Eng; 2012 Jan 01; 9(1):75-96. PubMed ID: 22229397
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Prey behavior, age-dependent vulnerability, and predation rates.
    Lingle S, Feldman A, Boyce MS, Wilson WF.
    Am Nat; 2008 Nov 01; 172(5):712-25. PubMed ID: 18840071
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Role of nutrient bound of prey on the dynamics of predator-mediated competitive-coexistence.
    Roy S, Alam S, Chattopadhyay J.
    Biosystems; 2005 Nov 01; 82(2):143-53. PubMed ID: 16112387
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.