These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

255 related items for PubMed ID: 15893348

  • 1. Quality and variability of osteoporosis data in general practice computer records: implications for disease registers.
    de Lusignan S, Chan T, Wood O, Hague N, Valentin T, Van Vlymen J.
    Public Health; 2005 Sep; 119(9):771-80. PubMed ID: 15893348
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Can patients with osteoporosis, who should benefit from implementation of the national service framework for older people, be identified from general practice computer records? A pilot study that illustrates the variability of computerized medical records and problems with searching them.
    de Lusignan S, Chan T, Wells S, Cooper A, Harvey M, Brew S, Wright M.
    Public Health; 2003 Nov; 117(6):438-45. PubMed ID: 14522160
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Can general practice data be used for needs assessment and health care planning in an inner-London district?
    Scobie S, Basnett I, McCartney P.
    J Public Health Med; 1995 Dec; 17(4):475-83. PubMed ID: 8639350
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Completeness and accuracy of morbidity and repeat prescribing records held on general practice computers in Scotland.
    Whitelaw FG, Nevin SL, Milne RM, Taylor RJ, Taylor MW, Watt AH.
    Br J Gen Pract; 1996 Mar; 46(404):181-6. PubMed ID: 8731627
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Assessment of the completeness and accuracy of computer medical records in four practices committed to recording data on computer.
    Pringle M, Ward P, Chilvers C.
    Br J Gen Pract; 1995 Oct; 45(399):537-41. PubMed ID: 7492423
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Secondary screening for osteoporosis in patients admitted for hip fracture to a rehabilitation center. Results of a survey].
    Dupeyron A, Javier RM, Froehlig P, Lecocq J, Isner-Horobeti ME, Vautravers P.
    Ann Readapt Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 49(8):595-9. PubMed ID: 16764961
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Characterization of patients with an inadequate clinical outcome from osteoporosis therapy: the Observational Study of Severe Osteoporosis (OSSO).
    Jakob F, Marín F, Martín-Mola E, Torgerson D, Fardellone P, Adami S, Thalassinos NC, Sykes D, Melo-Gomes J, Chinn C, Nicholson T, Cooper C.
    QJM; 2006 Aug; 99(8):531-43. PubMed ID: 16861718
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Assessment of the clinical management of fragility fractures and implications for the new HEDIS osteoporosis measure.
    Foley KA, Foster SA, Meadows ES, Baser O, Long SR.
    Med Care; 2007 Sep; 45(9):902-6. PubMed ID: 17712262
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Problems with primary care data quality: osteoporosis as an exemplar.
    de Lusignan S, Valentin T, Chan T, Hague N, Wood O, van Vlymen J, Dhoul N.
    Inform Prim Care; 2004 Sep; 12(3):147-56. PubMed ID: 15606987
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Epidemiology, etiology, and diagnosis of osteoporosis.
    Lane NE.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Feb; 194(2 Suppl):S3-11. PubMed ID: 16448873
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Regarding the article "low BMD is less predictive than reported falls for future limb fractures in women across Europe: results from the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study", by Kaptoge et al.
    Pijpers E, van der Klauw M, Nieuwenhuijzen Kruseman AC, Geusens PP.
    Bone; 2006 Jan; 38(1):145; author reply 146-9. PubMed ID: 16153901
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Osteoporosis and vertebral compression fractures-continued missed opportunities.
    Freedman BA, Potter BK, Nesti LJ, Giuliani JR, Hampton C, Kuklo TR.
    Spine J; 2008 Jan; 8(5):756-62. PubMed ID: 18343730
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Osteoporosis in multiple sclerosis.
    Hearn AP, Silber E.
    Mult Scler; 2010 Sep; 16(9):1031-43. PubMed ID: 20551086
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Persistent bisphosphonate use and the risk of osteoporotic fractures in clinical practice: a database analysis study.
    van den Boogaard CH, Breekveldt-Postma NS, Borggreve SE, Goettsch WG, Herings RM.
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2006 Sep; 22(9):1757-64. PubMed ID: 16968579
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The quality of record keeping in primary care: a comparison of computerised, paper and hybrid systems.
    Hamilton WT, Round AP, Sharp D, Peters TJ.
    Br J Gen Pract; 2003 Dec; 53(497):929-33; discussion 933. PubMed ID: 14960216
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Fracture panorama in Umea].
    Bergström U, Björnstig U, Svensson O.
    Lakartidningen; 2003 Dec; 103(40):2967-8. PubMed ID: 17115659
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Evaluating bone health in women with oestrogen receptor positive breast cancer (ERBC) starting aromatase inhibitors.
    Clunie GP, Clark A, Mortimer CJ, Stephenson S, Aitken J, Smith C, Sherwin E, Archer TJ.
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2009 May; 35(5):475-80. PubMed ID: 18950981
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Follow-up for osteoporosis in older patients three years after a fracture.
    Schurink M, Hegeman JH, Kreeftenberg HG, Ten Duis HJ.
    Neth J Med; 2007 Feb; 65(2):71-4. PubMed ID: 17379932
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [Densitometric parameters in the presence of risk factors and complications of osteoporosis].
    Litovchenko VI.
    Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 2005 Feb; (1):36-40. PubMed ID: 16711245
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.