These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


202 related items for PubMed ID: 15898385

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Comparative evaluation of a new removable Jasper Jumper functional appliance vs an activator-headgear combination.
    Sari Z, Goyenc Y, Doruk C, Usumez S.
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Jun; 73(3):286-93. PubMed ID: 12828437
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Dentoskeletal effects produced by a Jasper Jumper with an anterior bite plane.
    Bassarelli T, Franchi L, Defraia E, Melsen B.
    Angle Orthod; 2016 Sep; 86(5):775-81. PubMed ID: 26927020
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Evaluation of the Jones jig appliance for distal molar movement.
    Brickman CD, Sinha PK, Nanda RS.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Nov; 118(5):526-34. PubMed ID: 11094366
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Case report: modified use of the Jasper Jumper appliance in a skeletal Class II mixed dentition case requiring palatal expansion.
    Mills CM, McCulloch KJ.
    Angle Orthod; 1997 Nov; 67(4):277-82. PubMed ID: 9267576
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. [Treatment using the Lehman apparatus in patients with malocclusion in light of teleradiologic tests and dental arch measurements].
    Bielawska H.
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2002 Nov; 48():195-212. PubMed ID: 14601478
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Cephalometric changes following simultaneous first and second maxillary molar distalization using a non-compliance intraoral appliance.
    Papadopoulos MA, Mavropoulos A, Karamouzos A.
    J Orofac Orthop; 2004 Mar; 65(2):123-36. PubMed ID: 15206094
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Stability of Class II treatment with an edgewise crowned Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition: Skeletal and dental changes.
    Wigal TG, Dischinger T, Martin C, Razmus T, Gunel E, Ngan P.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Aug; 140(2):210-23. PubMed ID: 21803259
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. A cephalometric analysis of skeletal and dental changes contributing to Class II correction in activator treatment.
    Pancherz H.
    Am J Orthod; 1984 Feb; 85(2):125-34. PubMed ID: 6594053
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. An assessment of Andresen therapy on class II division 1 malocclusion.
    Calvert FJ.
    Br J Orthod; 1982 Jul; 9(3):149-53. PubMed ID: 6954989
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Comparison of the effects produced by headgear and pendulum appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
    Angelieri F, de Almeida RR, Janson G, Castanha Henriques JF, Pinzan A.
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Dec; 30(6):572-9. PubMed ID: 19054813
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.